학술논문

Blinded, randomized trial of sonographer versus AI cardiac function assessment
Document Type
article
Source
Nature. 616(7957)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Cancer
Cardiovascular
Heart Disease
Clinical Research
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Humans
Artificial Intelligence
Echocardiography
Stroke Volume
Ventricular Function
Left
Single-Blind Method
Workflow
Reproducibility of Results
Heart Function Tests
Cardiologists
General Science & Technology
Language
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been developed for echocardiography1-3, although it has not yet been tested with blinding and randomization. Here we designed a blinded, randomized non-inferiority clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05140642; no outside funding) of AI versus sonographer initial assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to evaluate the impact of AI in the interpretation workflow. The primary end point was the change in the LVEF between initial AI or sonographer assessment and final cardiologist assessment, evaluated by the proportion of studies with substantial change (more than 5% change). From 3,769 echocardiographic studies screened, 274 studies were excluded owing to poor image quality. The proportion of studies substantially changed was 16.8% in the AI group and 27.2% in the sonographer group (difference of -10.4%, 95% confidence interval: -13.2% to -7.7%, P