학술논문

Use of whole-genome sequencing to distinguish relapse from reinfection in a completed tuberculosis clinical trial
Document Type
article
Source
BMC Medicine. 15(1)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Infectious Diseases
Clinical Research
Tuberculosis
Rare Diseases
Biotechnology
Genetics
Orphan Drug
Infection
Good Health and Well Being
Antibiotics
Antitubercular
Bacterial Typing Techniques
DNA
Bacterial
Genome
Bacterial
Genotype
Humans
Minisatellite Repeats
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Phylogeny
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Polymorphism
Single Nucleotide
Recurrence
Sequence Analysis
DNA
Whole genome sequencing
Clinical trial
RIFAQUIN Study Team
Medical and Health Sciences
General & Internal Medicine
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Health sciences
Language
Abstract
BackgroundRIFAQUIN was a tuberculosis chemotherapy trial in southern Africa including regimens with high-dose rifapentine with moxifloxacin. Here, the application of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is evaluated within RIFAQUIN for identifying new infections in treated patients as either relapses or reinfections. WGS is further compared with mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units-variable number tandem repeats (MIRU-VNTR) typing. This is the first report of WGS being used to evaluate new infections in a completed clinical trial for which all treatment and epidemiological data are available for analysis.MethodsDNA from 36 paired samples of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultured from patients before and after treatment was typed using 24-loci MIRU-VNTR, in silico spoligotyping and WGS. Following WGS, the sequences were mapped against the reference strain H37Rv, the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences between pairs were identified, and a phylogenetic reconstruction was performed.ResultsWGS indicated that 32 of the paired samples had a very low number of SNP differences (0-5; likely relapses). One pair had an intermediate number of SNP differences, and was likely the result of a mixed infection with a pre-treatment minor genotype that was highly related to the post-treatment genotype; this was reclassified as a relapse, in contrast to the MIRU-VNTR result. The remaining three pairs had very high SNP differences (>750; likely reinfections).ConclusionsWGS and MIRU-VNTR both similarly differentiated relapses and reinfections, but WGS provided significant extra information. The low proportion of reinfections seen suggests that in standard chemotherapy trials with up to 24 months of follow-up, typing the strains brings little benefit to an analysis of the trial outcome in terms of differentiating relapse and reinfection. However, there is a benefit to using WGS as compared to MIRU-VNTR in terms of the additional genotype information obtained, in particular for defining the presence of mixed infections and the potential to identify known and novel drug-resistance markers.