학술논문

Multi-Site Cross-Site Inter-Rater and Test-Retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the MarkVCID White Matter Hyperintensity Growth and Regression Protocol.
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 96(2)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Biological Psychology
Clinical Sciences
Neurosciences
Psychology
Aging
Alzheimer's Disease
Acquired Cognitive Impairment
Brain Disorders
Dementia
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Neurodegenerative
Clinical Research
Alzheimer's Disease including Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD)
Neurological
Humans
White Matter
Reproducibility of Results
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Alzheimer Disease
Cognitive Dysfunction
Dementia
Vascular
Biomarkers
Alzheimer's disease
cerebrovascular disease
dementia
longitudinal
Mark VCID
small vessel ischemic disease
white matter hyperintensity
Alzheimer’s disease
MarkVCID
Cognitive Sciences
Neurology & Neurosurgery
Clinical sciences
Biological psychology
Language
Abstract
BackgroundWhite matter hyperintensities (WMH) that occur in the setting of vascular cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) may be dynamic increasing or decreasing volumes or stable over time. Quantifying such changes may prove useful as a biomarker for clinical trials designed to address vascular cognitive-impairment and dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.ObjectiveConducting multi-site cross-site inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the MarkVCID white matter hyperintensity growth and regression protocol.MethodsThe NINDS-supported MarkVCID Consortium evaluated a neuroimaging biomarker developed to track WMH change. Test-retest and cross-site inter-rater reliability of the protocol were assessed. Cognitive test scores were analyzed in relation to WMH changes to explore its construct validity.ResultsICC values for test-retest reliability of WMH growth and regression were 0.969 and 0.937 respectively, while for cross-site inter-rater ICC values for WMH growth and regression were 0.995 and 0.990 respectively. Word list long-delay free-recall was negatively associated with WMH growth (p < 0.028) but was not associated with WMH regression.ConclusionsThe present data demonstrate robust ICC validity of a WMH growth/regression protocol over a one-year period as measured by cross-site inter-rater and test-retest reliability. These data suggest that this approach may serve an important role in clinical trials of disease-modifying agents for VCID that may preferentially affect WMH growth, stability, or regression.