학술논문

Autologous Transplantation, Consolidation, and Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Results of the BMT CTN 0702 Trial
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of Clinical Oncology. 37(7)
Subject
Cancer
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Hematology
Clinical Research
Rare Diseases
Transplantation
6.1 Pharmaceuticals
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
Good Health and Well Being
Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Bortezomib
Consolidation Chemotherapy
Dexamethasone
Disease Progression
Female
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Humans
Lenalidomide
Maintenance Chemotherapy
Male
Melphalan
Middle Aged
Multiple Myeloma
Myeloablative Agonists
Progression-Free Survival
Prospective Studies
Remission Induction
Reoperation
Time Factors
Transplantation
Autologous
United States
Young Adult
Clinical Sciences
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Language
Abstract
PurposeSingle-cycle melphalan 200 mg/m2 and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) followed by lenalidomide (len) maintenance have improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We designed a prospective, randomized, phase III study to test additional interventions to improve PFS by comparing AHCT, tandem AHCT (AHCT/AHCT), and AHCT and four subsequent cycles of len, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD; AHCT + RVD), all followed by len until disease progression.Patients and methodsPatients with symptomatic MM within 12 months from starting therapy and without progression who were age 70 years or younger were randomly assigned to AHCT/AHCT + len (n = 247), AHCT + RVD + len (n = 254), or AHCT + len (n = 257). The primary end point was 38-month PFS.ResultsThe study population had a median age of 56 years (range, 20 to 70 years); 24% of patients had high-risk MM, 73% had a triple-drug regimen as initial therapy, and 18% were in complete response at enrollment. The 38-month PFS rate was 58.5% (95% CI, 51.7% to 64.6%) for AHCT/AHCT + len, 57.8% (95% CI, 51.4% to 63.7%) for AHCT + RVD + len, and 53.9% (95% CI, 47.4% to 60%) for AHCT + len. For AHCT/AHCT + len, AHCT + RVD + len, and AHCT + len, the OS rates were 81.8% (95% CI, 76.2% to 86.2%), 85.4% (95% CI, 80.4% to 89.3%), and 83.7% (95% CI, 78.4% to 87.8%), respectively, and the complete response rates at 1 year were 50.5% (n = 192), 58.4% (n = 209), and 47.1% (n = 208), respectively. Toxicity profiles and development of second primary malignancies were similar across treatment arms.ConclusionSecond AHCT or RVD consolidation as post-AHCT interventions for the up-front treatment of transplantation-eligible patients with MM did not improve PFS or OS. Single AHCT and len should remain as the standard approach for this population.