학술논문

Rapid diagnostic tests for infectious diseases in the emergency department
Document Type
article
Source
Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 27(2)
Subject
Medical Microbiology
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Clinical Research
Health Services
Infectious Diseases
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Emergency Care
Infection
Good Health and Well Being
Automation
Laboratory
Communicable Diseases
Diagnostic Test Approval
Diagnostic Tests
Routine
Emergency Service
Hospital
Europe
Humans
Reagent Kits
Diagnostic
United States
United States Food and Drug Administration
Clinical impact
ED
Infections
POC test
RDT
Rapid diagnosis
Public Health and Health Services
Microbiology
Clinical sciences
Medical microbiology
Language
Abstract
BackgroundRapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for infectious diseases, with a turnaround time of less than 2 hours, are promising tools that could improve patient care, antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention in the emergency department (ED) setting. Numerous RDTs have been developed, although not necessarily for the ED environment. Their successful implementation in the ED relies on their performance and impact on patient management.ObjectivesThe aim of this narrative review was to provide an overview of currently available RDTs for infectious diseases in the ED.SourcesPubMed was searched through August 2019 for available studies on RDTs for infectious diseases. Inclusion criteria included: commercial tests approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or Conformité Européenne (CE) in vitro diagnostic devices with data on clinical samples, ability to run on fully automated systems and result delivery within 2 hours.ContentA nonexhaustive list of representative commercially available FDA- or CE-approved assays was categorized by clinical syndrome: pharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection, gastrointestinal infection, meningitis and encephalitis, fever in returning travellers and sexually transmitted infection, including HIV. The performance of tests was described on the basis of clinical validation studies. Further, their impact on clinical outcomes and anti-infective use was discussed with a focus on ED-based studies.ImplicationsClinicians should be familiar with the distinctive features of each RDT and individual performance characteristics for each target. Their integration into ED work flow should be preplanned considering local constraints of given settings. Additional clinical studies are needed to further evaluate their clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.