학술논문

Diagnosing Level of Consciousness: The Limits of the Glasgow Coma Scale Total Score.
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of neurotrauma. 38(23)
Subject
TRACK-TBI Investigators
Humans
Consciousness Disorders
Glasgow Coma Scale
Adult
Middle Aged
Female
Male
Patient Acuity
behavioral assessments
consciousness
diagnosis
prognosis
traumatic brain injury
Traumatic Head and Spine Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Physical Injury - Accidents and Adverse Effects
Brain Disorders
Neurosciences
Behavioral and Social Science
Clinical Sciences
Neurology & Neurosurgery
Language
Abstract
In nearly all clinical and research contexts, the initial severity of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) is measured using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) total score. The GCS total score however, may not accurately reflect level of consciousness, a critical indicator of injury severity. We investigated the relationship between GCS total scores and level of consciousness in a consecutive sample of 2455 adult subjects assessed with the GCS 69,487 times as part of the multi-center Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study. We assigned each GCS subscale score combination a level of consciousness rating based on published criteria for the following disorders of consciousness (DoC) diagnoses: coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, minimally conscious state, and post-traumatic confusional state, and present our findings using summary statistics and four illustrative cases. Participants had the following characteristics: mean (standard deviation) age 41.9 (17.6) years, 69% male, initial GCS 3-8 = 13%; 9-12 = 5%; 13-15 = 82%. All GCS total scores between 4-14 were associated with more than one DoC diagnosis; the greatest variability was observed for scores of 7-11. Further, a wide range of total scores was associated with identical DoC diagnoses. Importantly, a diagnosis of coma was only possible with GCS total scores of 3-6. The GCS total score does not accurately reflect level of consciousness based on published DoC diagnostic criteria. To improve the classification of patients with TBI and to inform the design of future clinical trials, clinicians and investigators should consider individual subscale behaviors and more comprehensive assessments when evaluating TBI severity.