학술논문

Safety and physiological effects of two different doses of elosulfase alfa in patients with morquio a syndrome: A randomized, double‐blind, pilot study
Document Type
article
Source
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 167(10)
Subject
Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Pain Research
Chronic Pain
Cardiovascular
Clinical Research
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
6.7 Physical
6.1 Pharmaceuticals
Musculoskeletal
Adolescent
Adult
Child
Chondroitinsulfatases
Double-Blind Method
Drug Administration Schedule
Enzyme Replacement Therapy
Exercise Test
Female
Heart Function Tests
Humans
Keratan Sulfate
Male
Mucopolysaccharidosis IV
Muscle Strength
Patient Safety
Pilot Projects
Recombinant Proteins
Respiratory Function Tests
Treatment Outcome
Walking
mucopolysaccharidosis IV
cardiopulmonary exercise test
safety
respiratory function tests
muscle strength
physical endurance
GALNS protein
human [supplementary concept]
enzyme replacement therapy
Genetics
Clinical sciences
Language
Abstract
The primary treatment outcomes of a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, pilot study evaluating safety, physiological, and pharmacological effects of elosulfase alfa in patients with Morquio A syndrome are herewith presented. Patients aged ≥7 years and able to walk ≥200 m in the 6-min walk test (6MWT) were randomized to elosulfase alfa 2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg/week for 27 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of both doses. Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects on endurance (6MWT and 3-min stair climb test [3MSCT]), exercise capacity (cardio-pulmonary exercise test [CPET]), respiratory function, muscle strength, cardiac function, pain, and urine keratan sulfate (uKS) levels, and to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. Twenty-five patients were enrolled (15 randomized to 2.0 mg/kg/week and 10 to 4.0 mg/kg/week). No new or unexpected safety signals were observed. After 24 weeks, there were no improvements versus baseline in the 6MWT, yet numerical improvements were seen in the 3MSCT with 4.0 mg/kg/week. uKS and pharmacokinetic data suggested no linear relationship over the 2.0-4.0 mg/kg dose range. Overall, an abnormal exercise capacity (evaluated in 10 and 5 patients in the 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg/week groups, respectively), impaired muscle strength, and considerable pain were observed at baseline, and there were trends towards improvements in all domains after treatment. In conclusion, preliminary data of this small study in a Morquio A population with relatively good endurance confirmed the acceptable safety profile of elosulfase alfa and showed a trend of increased exercise capacity and muscle strength and decreased pain.