학술논문

Optimal NIV Medicare Access Promotion: Patients With COPD A Technical Expert Panel Report From the American College of Chest Physicians, the American Association for Respiratory Care, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, and the American Thoracic Society
Document Type
article
Source
CHEST Journal. 160(5)
Subject
Bioengineering
Clinical Research
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Assistive Technology
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Lung
Respiratory
Good Health and Well Being
Airway Management
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Home Care Services
Humans
Medicare
Noninvasive Ventilation
Patient Participation
Patient Selection
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Pulmonary Disease
Chronic Obstructive
Respiratory Insufficiency
United States
ONMAP Technical Expert Panel
COPD
hypercapnic respiratory failure
mechanical ventilation
noninvasive ventilation
Clinical Sciences
Respiratory System
Language
Abstract
This document summarizes the work of the COPD Technical Expert Panel working group. For patients with COPD, the most pressing current coverage barriers identified were onerous diagnostic requirements focused on oxygenation (rather than ventilation) and difficulty obtaining bilevel devices with backup rate capabilities. Because of these difficulties, many patients with COPD were instead sometimes prescribed home mechanical ventilators. Critical evidence supports changes to current policies, including randomized controlled trial evidence suggesting a mortality benefit from bilevel positive airway pressure with backup rate and updated clinical practice guidelines from the American Thoracic Society as well as the European Respiratory Society. To achieve optimal access to noninvasive ventilation for patients with COPD, we make the following key recommendations: (1) removal of the need for overnight oximetry testing; (2) the ability to initiate therapy using bilevel devices with backup rate capability; and (3) increased duration of time to meet adherence criteria (ie, a second 90-day trial period) in those patients actively engaged in their care. Clear guidelines based on medical necessity are also included for patients who require initiation of or switch to a home mechanical ventilator. Adoption of these proposed recommendations would result in the right device, for the right type of patient with COPD, at the right time. Finally, we emphasize the need for adequate clinical support during initiation and maintenance of home noninvasive ventilation in such patients.