학술논문

Insight into 3D micro‐CT data: exploring segmentation algorithms through performance metrics
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of Synchrotron Radiation. 24(5)
Subject
Chemical Sciences
Physical Chemistry
Physical Sciences
Atomic
Molecular and Optical Physics
Condensed Matter Physics
Bioengineering
Biomedical Imaging
Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD)
unsupervised segmentation
micro-tomography
ceramic matrix composites
image analysis
Optical Physics
Physical Chemistry (incl. Structural)
Biophysics
Physical chemistry
Atomic
molecular and optical physics
Condensed matter physics
Language
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) micro-tomography (µ-CT) has proven to be an important imaging modality in industry and scientific domains. Understanding the properties of material structure and behavior has produced many scientific advances. An important component of the 3D µ-CT pipeline is image partitioning (or image segmentation), a step that is used to separate various phases or components in an image. Image partitioning schemes require specific rules for different scientific fields, but a common strategy consists of devising metrics to quantify performance and accuracy. The present article proposes a set of protocols to systematically analyze and compare the results of unsupervised classification methods used for segmentation of synchrotron-based data. The proposed dataflow for Materials Segmentation and Metrics (MSM) provides 3D micro-tomography image segmentation algorithms, such as statistical region merging (SRM), k-means algorithm and parallel Markov random field (PMRF), while offering different metrics to evaluate segmentation quality, confidence and conformity with standards. Both experimental and synthetic data are assessed, illustrating quantitative results through the MSM dashboard, which can return sample information such as media porosity and permeability. The main contributions of this work are: (i) to deliver tools to improve material design and quality control; (ii) to provide datasets for benchmarking and reproducibility; (iii) to yield good practices in the absence of standards or ground-truth for ceramic composite analysis.