학술논문

Novel CFTR Variants Identified during the First 3 Years of Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening in California
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 15(5)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Genetic Testing
Clinical Research
Pediatric Research Initiative
Biotechnology
Genetics
Rare Diseases
Perinatal Period - Conditions Originating in Perinatal Period
Prevention
Lung
Pediatric
Cystic Fibrosis
2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Aetiology
Congenital
Algorithms
Alleles
California
Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator
Humans
Infant
Infant
Newborn
Mutation
Neonatal Screening
California Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Consortium
Medical Microbiology
Pathology
Clinical sciences
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Language
Abstract
California uses a unique method to screen newborns for cystic fibrosis (CF) that includes gene scanning and DNA sequencing after only one California-40 cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) panel mutation has been identified in hypertrypsinogenemic specimens. Newborns found by sequencing to have one or more additional mutations or variants (including novel variants) in the CFTR gene are systematically followed, allowing for prospective assessment of the pathogenic potential of these variants. During the first 3 years of screening, 55 novel variants were identified. Six of these novel variants were discovered in five screen-negative participants and three were identified in multiple unrelated participants. Ten novel variants (c.2554_2555insT, p.F1107L, c.-152G>C, p.L323P, p.L32M, c.2883_2886dupGTCA, c.2349_2350insT, p.K114del, c.-602A>T, and c.2822delT) were associated with a CF phenotype (42% of participants were diagnosed at 4 to 25 months of age), whereas 26 were associated with CFTR-related metabolic syndrome to date. Associations with the remaining novel variants were confounded by the presence of other diseases or other mutations in cis or by inadequate follow-up. These findings have implications for how CF newborn screening and follow-up is conducted and will help guide which genotypes should, and which should not, be considered screen positive for CF in California and elsewhere.