학술논문

Cartilage T1ρ and T2 relaxation times: longitudinal reproducibility and variations using different coils, MR systems and sites
Document Type
article
Source
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 23(12)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Clinical Research
Biomedical Imaging
Bioengineering
Cartilage
Articular
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Image Processing
Computer-Assisted
Knee Joint
Longitudinal Studies
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Osteoarthritis
Knee
Phantoms
Imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Cartilage
Quantitative MRI
T-1 rho
T-2
Reproducibility
Multi-site study
T(1ρ)
T(2)
Biomedical Engineering
Human Movement and Sports Sciences
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Clinical sciences
Sports science and exercise
Language
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the longitudinal reproducibility and variations of cartilage T1ρ and T2 measurements using different coils, MR systems and sites.MethodsSingle-Site study: Phantom data were collected monthly for up to 29 months on four GE 3T MR systems. Data from phantoms and human subjects were collected on two MR systems using the same model of coil; and were collected on one MR system using two models of coils. Multi-site study: Three participating sites used the same model of MR systems and coils, and identical imaging protocols. Phantom data were collected monthly. Human subjects were scanned and rescanned on the same day at each site. Two traveling human subjects were scanned at all three sites.ResultsSingle-Site Study: The phantom longitudinal RMS-CVs ranged from 1.8% to 2.7% for T1ρ and 1.8-2.8% for T2. Significant differences were found in T1ρ and T2 values using different MR systems and coils. Multi-Site Study: The phantom longitudinal RMS-CVs ranged from 1.3% to 2.6% for T1ρ and 1.2-2.7% for T2. Across three sites (n = 16), the in vivo scan-rescan RMS-CV was 3.1% and 4.0% for T1ρ and T2, respectively. Phantom T1ρ and T2 values were significantly different between three sites but highly correlated (R > 0.99). No significant difference was found in T1ρ and T2 values of traveling controls, with cross-site RMS-CV as 4.9% and 4.4% for T1ρ and T2, respectively.ConclusionWith careful quality control and cross-calibration, quantitative MRI can be readily applied in multi-site studies and clinical trials for evaluating cartilage degeneration.