학술논문

Identifying the preferable rheumatoid arthritis subgroups for intervention with the anti-RANKL antibody denosumab to reduce progression of joint destruction
Document Type
article
Source
RMD Open. 6(2)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Autoimmune Disease
Arthritis
Clinical Research
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
6.1 Pharmaceuticals
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
Inflammatory and immune system
Adult
Aged
Antirheumatic Agents
Arthritis
Rheumatoid
Bone Density Conservation Agents
Clinical Decision-Making
Denosumab
Disease Management
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Molecular Targeted Therapy
Patient Selection
RANK Ligand
Treatment Outcome
Rheumatoid Arthritis
DMARDs
Treatment
Clinical sciences
Language
Abstract
To clarify which rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients benefit most from the anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand antibody denosumab to reduce the progression of joint destruction. We pooled patient data from the 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled DRIVE (phase II) and DESIRABLE (phase III) studies. In DRIVE, concomitant treatment was limited to methotrexate, salazosulfapyridine and bucillamine. In DESIRABLE, patients could receive any disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. RA patients were randomised to denosumab 60 mg every 6 months (Q6M), every 3 months (Q3M) or placebo. Efficacy was assessed by van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score (mTSS), bone erosion score (ES) and joint space narrowing score (JSNS). Change in mTSS was assessed in subgroups stratified by risk factors for radiographic damage if the interaction factor was significant. The pooled analysis included 909 patients. Denosumab reduced worsening of mTSS (mean (SD)) at 12 months in the Q6M (0.88 (3.30), p=0.0024) and Q3M (0.66 (2.16), p=0.0002) groups versus placebo (1.50 (3.73)). This reduction in mTSS progression was due to the change in ES (Q6M, 0.44 (1.89), p=0.0006; Q3M, 0.20 (0.86), p