학술논문

Relative contribution of clinicopathological variables, genomic markers, transcriptomic subtyping and microenvironment features for outcome prediction in stage II/III colorectal cancer
Document Type
article
Source
Annals of Oncology. 30(10)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Immunology
Cancer
Digestive Diseases
Clinical Research
Colo-Rectal Cancer
Adult
Aged
Aged
80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Biomarkers
Tumor
Chemotherapy
Adjuvant
Colorectal Neoplasms
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gene Expression Regulation
Neoplastic
Genomics
Humans
Male
Microsatellite Instability
Middle Aged
Mutation
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Transcriptome
Tumor Microenvironment
Young Adult
colorectal cancer
prognosis
microsatellite instability
CMS
immune
stromal
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Clinical sciences
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Language
Abstract
BackgroundIt remains unknown to what extent consensus molecular subtype (CMS) groups and immune-stromal infiltration patterns improve our ability to predict outcomes over tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC).Patients and methodsWe carried out a comprehensive retrospective biomarker analysis of prognostic markers in adjuvant chemotherapy-untreated (N = 1656) and treated (N = 980), stage II (N = 1799) and III (N = 837) CRCs. We defined CMS scores and estimated CD8+ cytotoxic lymphocytes (CytoLym) and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) infiltration scores from bulk tumor tissue transcriptomes (CMSclassifier and MCPcounter R packages); constructed a stratified multivariable Cox model for disease-free survival (DFS); and calculated the relative proportion of explained variation by each marker (clinicopathological [ClinPath], genomics [Gen: MSI, BRAF and KRAS mutations], CMS scores [CMS] and microenvironment cells [MicroCells: CytoLym+CAF]).ResultsIn multivariable models, only ClinPath and MicroCells remained significant prognostic factors, with both CytoLym and CAF infiltration scores improving survival prediction beyond other markers. The explained variation for DFS models of ClinPath, MicroCells, Gen markers and CMS4 scores was 77%, 14%, 5.3% and 3.7%, respectively, in stage II; and 55.9%, 35.1%, 4.1% and 0.9%, respectively, in stage III. Patients whose tumors were CytoLym high/CAF low had better DFS than other strata [HR=0.71 (0.6-0.9); P = 0.004]. Microsatellite stable tumors had the strongest signal for improved outcomes with CytoLym high scores (interaction P = 0.04) and the poor prognosis linked to high CAF scores was limited to stage III disease (interaction P = 0.04).ConclusionsOur results confirm that tumor microenvironment infiltration patterns represent potent determinants of the risk for distant dissemination in early-stage CRC. Multivariable models suggest that the prognostic value of MSI and CMS groups is largely explained by CytoLym and CAF infiltration patterns.