학술논문

Quantifying the influence of mutation detection on tumour subclonal reconstruction.
Document Type
article
Source
Nature communications. 11(1)
Subject
Clone Cells
Humans
Prostatic Neoplasms
Computational Biology
Genetic Heterogeneity
Mutation
Polymorphism
Single Nucleotide
Algorithms
Models
Genetic
Male
DNA Copy Number Variations
Clonal Evolution
Biomarkers
Tumor
Whole Genome Sequencing
Human Genome
Cancer
Genetics
Language
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing can be used to estimate subclonal populations in tumours and this intra-tumoural heterogeneity is linked to clinical outcomes. Many algorithms have been developed for subclonal reconstruction, but their variabilities and consistencies are largely unknown. We evaluate sixteen pipelines for reconstructing the evolutionary histories of 293 localized prostate cancers from single samples, and eighteen pipelines for the reconstruction of 10 tumours with multi-region sampling. We show that predictions of subclonal architecture and timing of somatic mutations vary extensively across pipelines. Pipelines show consistent types of biases, with those incorporating SomaticSniper and Battenberg preferentially predicting homogenous cancer cell populations and those using MuTect tending to predict multiple populations of cancer cells. Subclonal reconstructions using multi-region sampling confirm that single-sample reconstructions systematically underestimate intra-tumoural heterogeneity, predicting on average fewer than half of the cancer cell populations identified by multi-region sequencing. Overall, these biases suggest caution in interpreting specific architectures and subclonal variants.