학술논문

A randomized controlled phase III study of VB-111 combined with bevacizumab vs bevacizumab monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GLOBE)
Document Type
article
Source
Neuro-Oncology. 22(5)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Brain Disorders
Neurosciences
Brain Cancer
Cancer
Rare Diseases
Clinical Research
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
6.2 Cellular and gene therapies
6.1 Pharmaceuticals
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Bevacizumab
Brain Neoplasms
Glioblastoma
Humans
Progression-Free Survival
Treatment Outcome
anti-angiogenesis
gene therapy
glioblastoma VB-111
viral immuno-oncology
GLOBE Study Investigators
VB-111
glioblastoma
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Language
Abstract
BackgroundOfranergene obadenovec (VB-111) is an anticancer viral therapy that demonstrated in a phase II study a survival benefit for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) who were primed with VB-111 monotherapy that was continued after progression with concomitant bevacizumab.MethodsThis pivotal phase III randomized, controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of upfront combination of VB-111 and bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive VB-111 1013 viral particles every 8 weeks in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (combination arm) or bevacizumab monotherapy (control arm). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsEnrolled were 256 patients at 57 sites. Median exposure to VB-111 was 4 months. The study did not meet its primary or secondary goals. Median OS was 6.8 versus 7.9 months in the combination versus control arm (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI: 0.91-1.59; P = 0.19) and ORR was 27.3% versus 21.9% (P = 0.26). A higher rate of grades 3-5 adverse events was reported in the combination arm (67% vs 40%), mainly attributed to a higher rate of CNS and flu-like/fever events. Trends for improved survival with combination treatment were seen in the subgroup of patients with smaller tumors and in patients who had a posttreatment febrile reaction.ConclusionsIn this study, upfront concomitant administration of VB-111 and bevacizumab failed to improve outcomes in rGBM. Change of treatment regimen, with the lack of VB-111 monotherapy priming, may explain the differences from the favorable phase II results.Clinical trials registrationNCT02511405.