학술논문

Neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms of circadian rhythm disruption in bipolar disorder: A critical multi‐disciplinary literature review and agenda for future research from the ISBD task force on chronobiology
Document Type
article
Source
Bipolar Disorders. 24(3)
Subject
Health Services and Systems
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Health Sciences
Behavioral and Social Science
Sleep Research
Prevention
Neurosciences
Brain Disorders
Clinical Research
Mental Health
Serious Mental Illness
Bipolar Disorder
Mental health
Animals
Behavioral Research
Chronobiology Disorders
Circadian Rhythm
Humans
Sleep
actigraphy
animal models
biomarker
chronobiology
circadian
clock gene
levels of analysis
light
lithium
sleep
Psychiatry
Clinical sciences
Health services and systems
Language
Abstract
AimSymptoms of bipolar disorder (BD) include changes in mood, activity, energy, sleep, and appetite. Since many of these processes are regulated by circadian function, circadian rhythm disturbance has been examined as a biological feature underlying BD. The International Society for Bipolar Disorders Chronobiology Task Force (CTF) was commissioned to review evidence for neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms pertinent to BD.MethodDrawing upon expertise in animal models, biomarkers, physiology, and behavior, CTF analyzed the relevant cross-disciplinary literature to precisely frame the discussion around circadian rhythm disruption in BD, highlight key findings, and for the first time integrate findings across levels of analysis to develop an internally consistent, coherent theoretical framework.ResultsEvidence from multiple sources implicates the circadian system in mood regulation, with corresponding associations with BD diagnoses and mood-related traits reported across genetic, cellular, physiological, and behavioral domains. However, circadian disruption does not appear to be specific to BD and is present across a variety of high-risk, prodromal, and syndromic psychiatric disorders. Substantial variability and ambiguity among the definitions, concepts and assumptions underlying the research have limited replication and the emergence of consensus findings.ConclusionsFuture research in circadian rhythms and its role in BD is warranted. Well-powered studies that carefully define associations between BD-related and chronobiologically-related constructs, and integrate across levels of analysis will be most illuminating.