학술논문

More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science
Document Type
article
Source
Subject
Clinical and Health Psychology
Psychology
Mental Health
Behavioral and Social Science
Aetiology
2.3 Psychological
social and economic factors
Good Health and Well Being
Allostasis
Emotions
Human Development
Humans
Models
Biological
Stress
Psychological
Acute stress
Chronic stress
Daily stress
Affect
Appraisals
Motivational states
Emotional contagion
Measurement
Allostatic load
Clinical Sciences
Neurosciences
Endocrinology & Metabolism
Biological psychology
Language
Abstract
Stress can influence health throughout the lifespan, yet there is little agreement about what types and aspects of stress matter most for human health and disease. This is in part because "stress" is not a monolithic concept but rather, an emergent process that involves interactions between individual and environmental factors, historical and current events, allostatic states, and psychological and physiological reactivity. Many of these processes alone have been labeled as "stress." Stress science would be further advanced if researchers adopted a common conceptual model that incorporates epidemiological, affective, and psychophysiological perspectives, with more precise language for describing stress measures. We articulate an integrative working model, highlighting how stressor exposures across the life course influence habitual responding and stress reactivity, and how health behaviors interact with stress. We offer a Stress Typology articulating timescales for stress measurement - acute, event-based, daily, and chronic - and more precise language for dimensions of stress measurement.