학술논문

A Brief Digital Cognitive Assessment for Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Cuban Older Adults.
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 79(1)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Biological Psychology
Clinical Sciences
Neurosciences
Psychology
Neurodegenerative
Prevention
Alzheimer's Disease including Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD)
Aging
Brain Disorders
Acquired Cognitive Impairment
Dementia
Behavioral and Social Science
Clinical Research
Alzheimer's Disease
Neurological
Aged
Alzheimer Disease
Aphasia
Primary Progressive
Cognitive Dysfunction
Computers
Handheld
Cuba
Dementia
Vascular
Developing Countries
Executive Function
Frontotemporal Dementia
Humans
Memory
Mental Status and Dementia Tests
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
Spatial Processing
Mild cognitive impairment
primary care
tablet-based cognitive screening
Cognitive Sciences
Neurology & Neurosurgery
Clinical sciences
Biological psychology
Language
Abstract
BackgroundRapid technological advances offer a possibility to develop cost-effective digital cognitive assessment tools. However, it is unclear whether these measures are suitable for application in populations from Low and middle-income countries (LMIC).ObjectiveTo examine the accuracy and validity of the Brain Health Assessment (BHA) in detecting cognitive impairment in a Cuban population.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 146 participants (cognitively healthy = 53, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) = 46, dementia = 47) were recruited at primary care and tertiary clinics. The main outcomes included: accuracy of the BHA and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in discriminating between controls and cognitively impaired groups (MCI and dementia) and correlations between the BHA subtests of memory, executive functions, and visuospatial skills and criterion-standard paper-and-pencil tests in the same domains.ResultsThe BHA had an AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.98) in discriminating between controls and cognitively impaired groups (MCI and dementia, combined) with 0.91 sensitivity at 0.85 specificity. In discriminating between control and MCI groups only, the BHA tests had an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.99) with 0.71 sensitivity at 0.85 specificity. Performance was superior to the MoCA across all diagnostic groups. Concurrent and discriminant validity analyses showed moderate to strong correlations between the BHA tests and standard paper-and-pencil measures in the same domain and weak correlations with standard measures in unrelated domains.ConclusionThe BHA has excellent performance characteristics in detecting cognitive impairment including dementia and MCI in a Hispanic population in Cuba and outperformed the MoCA. These results support potential application of digital cognitive assessment for older adults in LMIC.