학술논문

Angelman syndrome genotypes manifest varying degrees of clinical severity and developmental impairment
Document Type
article
Source
Molecular Psychiatry. 26(7)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Brain Disorders
Neurosciences
Behavioral and Social Science
Clinical Research
Pediatric
Rare Diseases
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD)
Human Genome
Mental Health
Genetics
Aetiology
2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Mental health
Angelman Syndrome
Chromosomes
Human
Pair 15
Genomic Imprinting
Genotype
Humans
Phenotype
Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases
Biological Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
Psychiatry
Clinical sciences
Biological psychology
Clinical and health psychology
Language
Abstract
Angelman Syndrome (AS) is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder due to impaired expression of UBE3A in neurons. There are several genetic mechanisms that impair UBE3A expression, but they differ in how neighboring genes on chromosome 15 at 15q11-q13 are affected. There is evidence that different genetic subtypes present with different clinical severity, but a systematic quantitative investigation is lacking. Here we analyze natural history data on a large sample of individuals with AS (n = 250, 848 assessments), including clinical scales that quantify development of motor, cognitive, and language skills (Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition; Preschool Language Scale, Fourth Edition), adaptive behavior (Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales, Second Edition), and AS-specific symptoms (AS Clinical Severity Scale). We found that clinical severity, as captured by these scales, differs between genetic subtypes: individuals with UBE3A pathogenic variants and imprinting defects (IPD) are less affected than individuals with uniparental paternal disomy (UPD); of those with UBE3A pathogenic variants, individuals with truncating mutations are more impaired than those with missense mutations. Individuals with a deletion that encompasses UBE3A and other genes are most impaired, but in contrast to previous work, we found little evidence for an influence of deletion length (class I vs. II) on severity of manifestations. The results of this systematic analysis highlight the relevance of genomic regions beyond UBE3A as contributing factors in the AS phenotype, and provide important information for the development of new therapies for AS. More generally, this work exemplifies how increasing genetic irregularities are reflected in clinical severity.