학술논문
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions
Document Type
article
Author
Abbott, TMC; Abdalla, FB; Alarcon, A; Allam, S; Annis, J; Avila, S; Aylor, K; Banerji, M; Banik, N; Baxter, EJ; Bechtol, K; Becker, MR; Benson, BA; Bernstein, GM; Bertin, E; Bianchini, F; Blazek, J; Bleem, LE; Bridle, SL; Brooks, D; Buckley-Geer, E; Burke, DL; Carlstrom, JE; Rosell, A Carnero; Kind, M Carrasco; Carretero, J; Castander, FJ; Cawthon, R; Chang, C; Chang, CL; Cho, H-M; Choi, A; Chown, R; Crawford, TM; Crites, AT; Crocce, M; Cunha, CE; D'Andrea, CB; da Costa, LN; Davis, C; de Haan, T; DeRose, J; Desai, S; De Vicente, J; Diehl, HT; Dietrich, JP; Dobbs, MA; Dodelson, S; Doel, P; Drlica-Wagner, A; Eifler, TF; Elvin-Poole, J; Everett, WB; Flaugher, B; Fosalba, P; Friedrich, O; Frieman, J; Garcia-Bellido, J; Gatti, M; Gaztanaga, E; George, EM; Gerdes, DW; Giannantonio, T; Gruen, D; Gruendl, RA; Gschwend, J; Gutierrez, G; Halverson, NW; Harrington, NL; Hartley, WG; Holder, GP; Hollowood, DL; Holzapfel, WL; Honscheid, K; Hou, Z; Hoyle, B; Hrubes, JD; Huterer, D; Jain, B; James, DJ; Jarvis, M; Jeltema, T; Johnson, MWG; Johnson, MD; Kent, S; Kirk, D; Knox, L; Kokron, N; Krause, E; Kuehn, K; Lahav, O; Lee, AT; Leitch, EM; Li, TS; Lima, M; Lin, H; Luong-Van, D; MacCrann, N; Maia, MAG; Manzotti, A
Source
PHYSICAL REVIEW D. 100(2)
Subject
Language
Abstract
We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between threecosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field,and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. Thesethree fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping opticalimaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey andmillimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole TelescopeSunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints fromthe joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxydensity and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency betweenthese measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding noevidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmologicalmodels. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlationfunctions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum)yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} =0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We testfor consistency between these five correlation function measurements and thePlanck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding noevidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models.Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields$S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$.These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from thefirst year DES joint-probes analysis.