학술논문

SCAI expert consensus statement on operator and institutional requirements for PFO closure for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolic stroke
Document Type
article
Source
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 93(5)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Cardiovascular Medicine and Haematology
Brain Disorders
Cardiovascular
Prevention
Neurosciences
Stroke
Cardiac Catheterization
Clinical Decision-Making
Consensus
Education
Medical
Graduate
Embolism
Paradoxical
Evidence-Based Medicine
Foramen Ovale
Patent
Humans
Neurologists
Patient Safety
Recurrence
Risk Factors
Secondary Prevention
Treatment Outcome
ASD
PDA
PFO
comparative effectiveness
patient centered outcomes research
closure
evidence-based medicine
structural heart disease intervention
ASD/PDA/PFO
comparative effectiveness/patient centered outcomes research
Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
Cardiovascular System & Hematology
Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
Language
Abstract
Until recently, evidence to support Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) closure for secondary prevention of recurrent stroke has been controversial. Publication of high-quality evidence from randomized clinical trials and the subsequent FDA approval of two devices for percutaneous PFO closure is expected to increase the volume of PFO closure procedures not only in the United States but worldwide. As this technology is disseminated broadly to the public, ensuring the safe and efficacious performance of PFO closure is essential to mitigate risk and avoid unnecessary procedures. This document, prepared by a multi-disciplinary writing group convened by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and including representatives from the American Academy of Neurology, makes recommendations for institutional infrastructure and individual skills necessary to initiate and maintain an active PFO/stroke program, with emphasis on shared decision making and patient-centered care.