학술논문

Cross-Sectional Associations: Social Risks and Diabetes Care Quality, Outcomes
Document Type
article
Source
American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 63(3)
Subject
Health Services and Systems
Public Health
Health Sciences
Prevention
Diabetes
Nutrition
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Clinical Research
Health Services
Cardiovascular
Metabolic and endocrine
Zero Hunger
Adolescent
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diabetes Mellitus
Type 2
Glycated Hemoglobin
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Lipoproteins
LDL
Medical and Health Sciences
Education
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Health sciences
Language
Abstract
IntroductionSocial risks (e.g., food/transportation insecurity) can hamper type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) self-management, leading to poor outcomes. To determine the extent to which high-quality care can overcome social risks' health impacts, this study assessed the associations between reported social risks, receipt of guideline-based T2DM care, and T2DM outcomes when care is up to date among community health center patients.MethodsA cross-sectional study of adults aged ≥18 years (N=73,484) seen at 186 community health centers, with T2DM and ≥1 year of observation between July 2016 and February 2020. Measures of T2DM care included up-to-date HbA1c, microalbuminuria, low-density lipoprotein screening, and foot examination, and active statin prescription when indicated. Measures of T2DM outcomes among patients with up-to-date care included blood pressure, HbA1c, and low-density lipoprotein control on or within 6‒12 months of an index encounter. Analyses were conducted in 2021.ResultsIndividuals reporting transportation or housing insecurity were less likely to have up-to-date low-density lipoprotein screening; no other associations were seen between social risks and clinical care quality. Among individuals with up-to-date care, food insecurity was associated with lower adjusted rates of controlled HbA1c (79% vs 75%, p