학술논문

Effect of Lung Transplantation on Health-Related Quality of Life in the Era of the Lung Allocation Score: A U.S. Prospective Cohort Study.
Document Type
article
Source
American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. 17(5)
Subject
Humans
Prognosis
Lung Transplantation
Longitudinal Studies
Follow-Up Studies
Prospective Studies
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Resource Allocation
Health Care Rationing
Quality of Life
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Middle Aged
Female
Male
Young Adult
Surveys and Questionnaires
clinical decision-making
clinical research/practice
epidemiology
geriatrics
lung transplantation/pulmonology
organ allocation
quality of life
Organ Transplantation
Clinical Research
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Lung
Transplantation
Aging
Respiratory
Good Health and Well Being
clinical research
practice
lung transplantation
pulmonology
Medical and Health Sciences
Surgery
Language
Abstract
Under the U.S. Lung Allocation Score (LAS) system, older and sicker patients are prioritized for lung transplantation (LT). The impact of these changes on health-related quality of life (HRQL) after transplant has not been determined. In a single-center prospective cohort study from 2010 to 2016, we assessed HRQL before and repeatedly after LT for up to 3 years using the SF12-Physical and Mental Health, the respiratory-specific Airway Questionnaire 20-Revised, and the Euroqol 5D/Visual Analog Scale utility measures by multivariate linear mixed models jointly modeled with death. We also tested changes in LT-Valued Life Activities disability, BMI, allograft function, and 6-min walk test exercise capacity as predictors of HRQL change. Among 211 initial participants (92% of those eligible), LT improved HRQL by all 5 measures (p < 0.05) and all but SF12-Mental Health improved by threefold or greater than the minimally clinically important difference. Compared to younger participants, those aged ≥65 improved less in SF12-Physical and Mental Health (p < 0.01). Improvements in disability accounted for much of the HRQL improvement. In the LAS era, LT affords meaningful and durable HRQL improvements, mediated by amelioration of disability. Identifying factors limiting HRQL improvement in selected subgroups, especially those aged ≥65, are needed to maximize the net benefits of LT.