학술논문

Laparotomy and intraoperative enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding before and after the era of video capsule endoscopy and deep enteroscopy: A tertiary center experience.
Document Type
article
Source
American journal of surgery. 215(4)
Subject
Humans
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
Endoscopy
Gastrointestinal
Treatment Outcome
Hemostasis
Endoscopic
Intraoperative Care
Risk Factors
Retrospective Studies
Middle Aged
Female
Male
Capsule Endoscopy
Deep enteroscopy
Exploratory laparotomy
Intraoperative enteroscopy
Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding
Video capsule endoscopy
Digestive Diseases
Clinical Sciences
Surgery
Language
Abstract
BackgroundTo evaluate roles of intraoperative endoscopy (IOE) in management of severe obscure GI bleeding (OGIB) before vs. after introduction of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and deep enteroscopy (DE).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data of patients undergoing IOE for severe OGIB in a tertiary referral center.Results52 patients had laparotomy/IOE for OGIB, 11 pre and 41 post VCE/DE eras. In the pre VCE/DE era, 36.4% (4/11) had preoperative presumptive diagnoses while in the post VCE/DE era presumptive diagnoses were made in 48.8% (20/41) (p = 0.18). Preoperative evaluation led to correct diagnoses in 18.2% (2/11) in the pre and 51.2% (21/41) in the post VCE/DE era (p = 0.09). Vascular lesions and ulcers were the most common diagnoses, but rebleeding was common. No rebleeding was found among patients with tumors, Meckel's diverticulum, and aortoenteric fistula.ConclusionsPresumptive diagnoses in the post VCE/DE era were usually accurate. If VCE or DE are negative, the probability of negative IOE is high. Patients with tumors and Meckel's diverticulum were the best candidates for IOE.