학술논문

Facilitators and barriers to implementation of Alberta family integrated care (FICare) in level II neonatal intensive care units: a qualitative process evaluation substudy of a multicentre cluster-randomised controlled trial using the consolidated framework for implementation research
Document Type
article
Source
BMJ Open. 11(10)
Subject
Health Services and Systems
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Health Sciences
Pediatric
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Perinatal Period - Conditions Originating in Perinatal Period
Clinical Research
8.1 Organisation and delivery of services
7.1 Individual care needs
Health and social care services research
Management of diseases and conditions
Good Health and Well Being
Alberta
Delivery of Health Care
Integrated
Health Personnel
Humans
Infant
Newborn
Intensive Care Units
Neonatal
Parents
Qualitative Research
Alberta FICare in Level II NICU Study Team
Alberta FICare™ in Level II NICU Study Team
change management
organisation of health services
organisational development
paediatric intensive & critical care
qualitative research
Clinical Sciences
Public Health and Health Services
Other Medical and Health Sciences
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Health sciences
Psychology
Language
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the barriers and facilitators to implementing Alberta Family Integrated Care (AB-FICare [2019 Benzies]), a model of care for integrating parents into level II neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) care teams, from the perspective of healthcare providers (HCP) and hospital administrators.DesignQualitative process evaluation substudy.SettingTen level II NICUs in six cities across Alberta, Canada.ParticipantsHCP and hospital administrators (n=32) who were involved in the cluster-randomised controlled trial of AB-FICare in level II NICUs.MethodsPost-implementation semi-structured interviews were conducted via phone or in-person. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to develop interview guides, code transcripts and analyse data.ResultsKey facilitators to implementation of AB-FICare included (1) a receptive implementation climate, (2) compatibility of the intervention with individual and organisational practices, (3) available resources and access to knowledge and information for HCP and hospital administrators, (4) engagement of key stakeholders across the organisation, (5) engagement of and outcomes for intervention participants, and (6) reflecting and evaluating on implementation progress and patient and family outcomes. Barriers were (1) design quality and packaging of the intervention, (2) relative priority of AB-FICare in relation to other initiatives, and (3) learning climate within the organisation. Mixed influences on implementation depending on contextual factors were coded to eight constructs: intervention source, cost, peer pressure, external policy and incentives, staff needs and resources, structural characteristics, organisational incentives and rewards, and knowledge, beliefs and attitudes.ConclusionsThe characteristics of an organisation and the implementation process had largely positive influences, which can be leveraged for implementation of AB-FICare in the NICU. We recommend site-specific consultations to mitigate barriers and assess how swing factors might impact implementation given the local context, with the goal that strategies can be put in place to manage their influence on implementation.Trial registration numberNCT02879799.