학술논문

Progress in Developing Common Data Elements for Traumatic Brain Injury Research: Version Two – The End of the Beginning
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of Neurotrauma. 30(22)
Subject
Clinical and Health Psychology
Psychology
Traumatic Head and Spine Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Rehabilitation
Physical Injury - Accidents and Adverse Effects
Brain Disorders
Neurosciences
Mental health
Injuries and accidents
Acute Disease
Brain Concussion
Brain Injuries
Cooperative Behavior
Humans
Research Design
Research Report
Trauma Severity Indices
United States
acute
chronic
collaboration
concussion
data standardization
epidemiology
rehabilitation
Clinical Sciences
Neurology & Neurosurgery
Clinical sciences
Biological psychology
Language
Abstract
To accelerate data sharing and research on traumatic brain injury (TBI), several federal agencies have been collaborating to support the development and implementation of common data elements (CDEs). The first recommendations for CDEs were made in 2010, and were well suited for hospital-based studies of acute TBI in adults. To broaden the utility of the TBI CDEs, experts were asked to update the recommendations to make them relevant to all ages, levels of injury severity, and phases of recovery. The second version of the TBI CDEs (v.2) was organized around four major study types: 1) epidemiological research; 2) studies on acute, hospitalized patients; 3) studies of the rehabilitation for moderate/severe TBI; and 4) mild TBI/concussion research. Given the heterogeneity of TBI, only a small set of core CDEs were found to be relevant across all study types. However, within groups, a much larger set of highly relevant CDEs were identified, and these were called basic CDEs. In addition, an expanded number of supplemental CDEs were specified and recommended for use depending upon the study goals. Version 2 provides a rich data dictionary for TBI research with about 900 CDEs. Many of the CDEs overlap across the study types, which will facilitate comparisons and meta-analysis across studies. Further modifications of the CDEs should be based on evaluation of their usefulness following implementation across a range of studies.