학술논문

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Follow-Up of Esophageal Cancer
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of the American College of Radiology. 19(11)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Cancer
Rare Diseases
Clinical Research
Biomedical Imaging
Digestive Diseases
4.2 Evaluation of markers and technologies
Detection
screening and diagnosis
Humans
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Follow-Up Studies
Societies
Medical
Evidence-Based Medicine
Esophageal Neoplasms
Appropriateness Criteria
Appropriate Use Criteria
AUC
CT
Esophageal cancer
FDG-PET/CT
FDG-PET/MRI
MRI
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Expert Panels on Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Imaging
Public Health and Health Services
Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Clinical sciences
Language
Abstract
This document provides recommendations regarding the role of imaging in the staging and follow-up of esophageal cancer. For initial clinical staging, locoregional extent and nodal disease are typically assessed with esophagogastroduodenoscopy and esophageal ultrasound. FDG-PET/CT or CT of the chest and abdomen is usually appropriate for use in initial clinical staging as they provide additional information regarding distant nodal and metastatic disease. The detection of metastatic disease is critical in the initial evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer because it will direct patients to a treatment pathway centered on palliative radiation rather than surgery. For imaging during treatment, particularly neoadjuvant chemotherapy, FDG-PET/CT is usually appropriate, because some studies have found that it can provide information regarding primary lesion response, but more importantly it can be used to detect metastases that have developed since the induction of treatment. For patients who have completed treatment, FDG-PET/CT or CT of the chest and abdomen is usually appropriate for evaluating the presence and extent of metastases in patients with no suspected or known recurrence and in those with a suspected or known recurrence. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.