학술논문

Evaluating the ovarian cancer gonadotropin hypothesis: A candidate gene study
Document Type
article
Author
Lee, Alice WTyrer, Jonathan PDoherty, Jennifer AStram, Douglas AKupryjanczyk, JolantaDansonka-Mieszkowska, AgnieszkaPlisiecka-Halasa, JoannaSpiewankiewicz, BeataMyers, Emily JStudy, Australian CancerGroup, Australian Ovarian Cancer StudyChenevix-Trench, GeorgiaFasching, Peter ABeckmann, Matthias WEkici, Arif BHein, AlexanderVergote, IgnaceVan Nieuwenhuysen, ElsLambrechts, DietherWicklund, Kristine GEilber, UrsulaWang-Gohrke, ShanChang-Claude, JennyRudolph, AnjaSucheston-Campbell, LaraOdunsi, KunleMoysich, Kirsten BShvetsov, Yurii BThompson, Pamela JGoodman, Marc TWilkens, Lynne RDörk, ThiloHillemanns, PeterDürst, MatthiasRunnebaum, Ingo BBogdanova, NataliaPelttari, Liisa MNevanlinna, HeliLeminen, ArtoEdwards, Robert PKelley, Joseph LHarter, PhilippSchwaab, IraHeitz, Floriandu Bois, AndreasOrsulic, SandraLester, JennyWalsh, ChristineKarlan, Beth YHogdall, EstridKjaer, Susanne KJensen, AllanVierkant, Robert ACunningham, Julie MGoode, Ellen LFridley, Brooke LSouthey, Melissa CGiles, Graham GBruinsma, FionaWu, XifengHildebrandt, Michelle ATLu, KarenLiang, DongBisogna, MariaLevine, Douglas AWeber, Rachel PalmieriSchildkraut, Joellen MIversen, Edwin SBerchuck, AndrewTerry, Kathryn LCramer, Daniel WTworoger, Shelley SPoole, Elizabeth MOlson, Sara HOrlow, IreneBandera, Elisa VBjorge, LineTangen, Ingvild LSalvesen, Helga BKrakstad, CamillaMassuger, Leon FAGKiemeney, Lambertus AAben, Katja KHvan Altena, Anne MBean, YukiePejovic, TanjaKellar, MelissaLe, Nhu DCook, Linda SKelemen, Linda EBrooks-Wilson, AngelaLubinski, JanGronwald, JacekCybulski, CezaryJakubowska, AnnaWentzensen, NicolasBrinton, Louise ALissowska, JolantaYang, HannahNedergaard, Lotte
Source
Gynecologic Oncology. 136(3)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Biotechnology
Human Genome
Prevention
Aging
Genetics
Cancer
Ovarian Cancer
Rare Diseases
Aetiology
2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Biomarkers
Tumor
Case-Control Studies
Female
Genetic Markers
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genome-Wide Association Study
Genotype
Gonadotropins
Humans
Logistic Models
Ovarian Neoplasms
Polymorphism
Single Nucleotide
Risk Factors
Signal Transduction
Ovarian cancer
Gene
Polymorphisms
Genetic variation
Australian Cancer Study
Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group
Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Clinical sciences
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Reproductive medicine
Language
Abstract
ObjectiveOvarian cancer is a hormone-related disease with a strong genetic basis. However, none of its high-penetrance susceptibility genes and GWAS-identified variants to date are known to be involved in hormonal pathways. Given the hypothesized etiologic role of gonadotropins, an assessment of how variability in genes involved in the gonadotropin signaling pathway impacts disease risk is warranted.MethodsGenetic data from 41 ovarian cancer study sites were pooled and unconditional logistic regression was used to evaluate whether any of the 2185 SNPs from 11 gonadotropin signaling pathway genes was associated with ovarian cancer risk. A burden test using the admixture likelihood (AML) method was also used to evaluate gene-level associations.ResultsWe did not find any genome-wide significant associations between individual SNPs and ovarian cancer risk. However, there was some suggestion of gene-level associations for four gonadotropin signaling pathway genes: INHBB (p=0.045, mucinous), LHCGR (p=0.046, high-grade serous), GNRH (p=0.041, high-grade serous), and FSHB (p=0.036, overall invasive). There was also suggestive evidence for INHA (p=0.060, overall invasive).ConclusionsOvarian cancer studies have limited sample numbers, thus fewer genome-wide susceptibility alleles, with only modest associations, have been identified relative to breast and prostate cancers. We have evaluated the majority of ovarian cancer studies with biological samples, to our knowledge, leaving no opportunity for replication. Using both our understanding of biology and powerful gene-level tests, we have identified four putative ovarian cancer loci near INHBB, LHCGR, GNRH, and FSHB that warrant a second look if larger sample sizes and denser genotype chips become available.