학술논문

Novel Common Genetic Susceptibility Loci for Colorectal Cancer
Document Type
article
Author
Schmit, Stephanie LEdlund, Christopher KSchumacher, Fredrick RGong, JianHarrison, Tabitha AHuyghe, Jeroen RQu, ChenxuMelas, MarilenaVan Den Berg, David JWang, HansongTring, StephaniePlummer, Sarah JAlbanes, DemetriusAlonso, M HenarAmos, Christopher IAnton, KristenAragaki, Aaron KArndt, VolkerBarry, Elizabeth LBerndt, Sonja IBezieau, StéphaneBien, StephanieBloomer, AmandaBoehm, JuergenBoutron-Ruault, Marie-ChristineBrenner, HermannBrezina, StefanieBuchanan, Daniel DButterbach, KatjaCaan, Bette JCampbell, Peter TCarlson, Christopher SCastelao, Jose EChan, Andrew TChang-Claude, JennyChanock, Stephen JCheng, IonaCheng, Ya-WenChin, Lee SooChurch, James MChurch, TimothyCoetzee, Gerhard ACotterchio, MichelleCorrea, Marcia CruzCurtis, Keith RDuggan, DavidEaston, Douglas FEnglish, DallasFeskens, Edith JMFischer, RockyFitzGerald, Liesel MFortini, Barbara KFritsche, Lars GFuchs, Charles SGago-Dominguez, ManuelaGala, ManishGallinger, Steven JGauderman, W JamesGiles, Graham GGiovannucci, Edward LGogarten, Stephanie MGonzalez-Villalpando, ClicerioGonzalez-Villalpando, Elena MGrady, William MGreenson, Joel KGsur, AndreaGunter, MarcHaiman, Christopher AHampe, JochenHarlid, SophiaHarju, John FHayes, Richard BHofer, PhilippHoffmeister, MichaelHopper, John LHuang, Shu-ChenHuerta, Jose MariaHudson, Thomas JHunter, David JIdos, Gregory EIwasaki, MotokiJackson, Rebecca DJacobs, Eric JJee, Sun HaJenkins, Mark AJia, Wei-HuaJiao, ShuoJoshi, Amit DKolonel, Laurence NKono, SuminoriKooperberg, CharlesKrogh, VittorioKuehn, TilmanKüry, SébastienLaCroix, AndreaLaurie, Cecelia ALejbkowicz, FlavioLemire, MathieuLenz, Heinz-JosefLevine, David
Source
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 111(2)
Subject
Prevention
Cancer
Digestive Diseases
Human Genome
Genetics
Clinical Research
Colo-Rectal Cancer
Aetiology
2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Case-Control Studies
Colorectal Neoplasms
Ethnicity
Follow-Up Studies
Genetic Loci
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genome-Wide Association Study
Genotype
Humans
Polymorphism
Single Nucleotide
Prognosis
United States
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Language
Abstract
BackgroundPrevious genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 42 loci (P < 5 × 10-8) associated with risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Expanded consortium efforts facilitating the discovery of additional susceptibility loci may capture unexplained familial risk.MethodsWe conducted a GWAS in European descent CRC cases and control subjects using a discovery-replication design, followed by examination of novel findings in a multiethnic sample (cumulative n = 163 315). In the discovery stage (36 948 case subjects/30 864 control subjects), we identified genetic variants with a minor allele frequency of 1% or greater associated with risk of CRC using logistic regression followed by a fixed-effects inverse variance weighted meta-analysis. All novel independent variants reaching genome-wide statistical significance (two-sided P < 5 × 10-8) were tested for replication in separate European ancestry samples (12 952 case subjects/48 383 control subjects). Next, we examined the generalizability of discovered variants in East Asians, African Americans, and Hispanics (12 085 case subjects/22 083 control subjects). Finally, we examined the contributions of novel risk variants to familial relative risk and examined the prediction capabilities of a polygenic risk score. All statistical tests were two-sided.ResultsThe discovery GWAS identified 11 variants associated with CRC at P < 5 × 10-8, of which nine (at 4q22.2/5p15.33/5p13.1/6p21.31/6p12.1/10q11.23/12q24.21/16q24.1/20q13.13) independently replicated at a P value of less than .05. Multiethnic follow-up supported the generalizability of discovery findings. These results demonstrated a 14.7% increase in familial relative risk explained by common risk alleles from 10.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.9% to 13.7%; known variants) to 11.9% (95% CI = 9.2% to 15.5%; known and novel variants). A polygenic risk score identified 4.3% of the population at an odds ratio for developing CRC of at least 2.0.ConclusionsThis study provides insight into the architecture of common genetic variation contributing to CRC etiology and improves risk prediction for individualized screening.