학술논문

Perspectives of Chinese American smoker and nonsmoker household pairs about the creating smokefree living together program
Document Type
article
Source
Cancer. 124(S7)
Subject
Health Services and Systems
Public Health
Health Sciences
Tobacco Smoke and Health
Prevention
Cancer
Clinical Research
Behavioral and Social Science
Tobacco
Prevention of disease and conditions
and promotion of well-being
3.1 Primary prevention interventions to modify behaviours or promote wellbeing
Good Health and Well Being
Adult
Aged
Aged
80 and over
Asian
Early Intervention
Educational
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health Behavior
Health Knowledge
Attitudes
Practice
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Non-Smokers
Prognosis
San Francisco
Smokers
Smoking Prevention
Tobacco Use Disorder
Chinese
household
intervention
secondhand smoke
tobacco use
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Public Health and Health Services
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Public health
Language
Abstract
BackgroundChinese men smoke at high rates, and this puts household members at risk for tobacco-related diseases. Culturally responsive interventions that provide education and support are needed to promote smokefree living and reduce smoke exposure, particularly for US immigrants who experience changes in smokefree social norms. This qualitative study examines perspectives of Chinese American smoker and nonsmoker household pairs in the Creating Smokefree Living Together program.MethodsFour focus groups were conducted with 30 Chinese American participants (15 smokers and 15 nonsmokers) who, in household pairs, completed smokefree education interventions of either brief or moderate intensity. Nearly three-quarters of the smokers continued to smoke after the intervention at the time of focus group participation. All smokers were male, and most household nonsmokers were female spouses. All participants had limited English proficiency. Focus group meetings were recorded, and the recordings were translated and transcribed. Transcripts and field notes were thematically analyzed.ResultsThe following themes, shared by smokers and nonsmokers across interventions, were identified: 1) there was a preference for dyadic and group interventions because of the support offered, 2) increased knowledge of the health harms of smoke exposure within a pair improved the nonsmoker's support for smokefree living, 3) learning communication strategies improved household relationships and assertiveness for smokefree environments, 4) biochemical feedback was useful but had short-term effects, and 5) project magnets provided cues to action.ConclusionsInvolving household partners is critical to smokefree interventions. Simple reminders at home appear to be more powerful than personal biochemical feedback of smoke exposure for sustaining motivation and engagement in ongoing behavioral changes within the household. Cancer 2018;124:1599-606. © 2018 American Cancer Society.