학술논문

Impact of a smoke-free-living educational intervention for smokers and household nonsmokers: A randomized trial of Chinese American pairs.
Document Type
article
Source
Subject
Humans
Tobacco Use Disorder
Prognosis
Follow-Up Studies
Health Knowledge
Attitudes
Practice
Health Behavior
Counseling
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged
80 and over
Middle Aged
Asian Americans
San Francisco
Female
Male
Community-Based Participatory Research
Young Adult
Smokers
Smoking Prevention
Non-Smokers
Early Intervention
Educational
4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) biomarker
Chinese
secondhand smoke
smoke-free home
tobacco cessation
Prevention
Substance Abuse
Clinical Research
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Tobacco Smoke and Health
Tobacco
Cancer
3.1 Primary prevention interventions to modify behaviours or promote wellbeing
Stroke
Cardiovascular
Respiratory
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Public Health and Health Services
Language
Abstract
BackgroundChinese American men smoke at a high rate, which puts household nonsmokers at risk. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief-intensity versus moderate-intensity smoke-free-living educational intervention for household pairs.MethodsThe authors conducted a randomized controlled trial of Cantonese-speaking Chinese American smoker and household nonsmoker pairs in San Francisco, California. Pairs were randomized to moderate-intensity or brief-intensity group sessions with their household partner. The moderate-intensity group received 2 group sessions, a laboratory report of their baseline smoke exposure, as measured by 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL), and 3 follow-up calls over 6 months. The brief-intensity group received 1 group session on tobacco-cessation resources. Primary outcomes were biochemically validated, past-month smoking abstinence and elimination of nonsmoker household exposure at 12 months.ResultsParticipant pairs (n = 203) were male smokers, one-half of whom did not intend to quit within 6 months, with mostly female spouses as household nonsmokers. Approximately three-quarters of nonsmokers in both groups already had smoke-free home rules. At 12 months, smokers in both groups had similar biochemically validated 30-day abstinence rates (moderate-intensity group, 0%-20.7%; brief-intensity group, 0%-20.0%; P = .002 over time). More smokers in the moderate-intensity group used subsequent cessation group classes (moderate-intensity group, 50%; brief-intensity group, 24%; P = .004). Household nonsmokers in both groups had similar biochemically validated rates of no home exposure (moderate-intensity group, 24.5%-42.2%; brief-intensity group, 24.8%-33.3%; P = .0001 over time).ConclusionsA moderate-intensity smoke-free-living educational intervention for Chinese-speaking household pairs was not more effective than a brief-intensity intervention for smoking abstinence and elimination of household nonsmoker exposure. Abstinence rates were similar to those achieved with standard group counseling. Cancer 2018;124:1590-8. © 2018 American Cancer Society.