학술논문

Efficacy and safety of two neutralising monoclonal antibody therapies, sotrovimab and BRII-196 plus BRII-198, for adults hospitalised with COVID-19 (TICO): a randomised controlled trial
Document Type
article
Author
Group, ACTIV-3 Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19 StudySelf, Wesley HSandkovsky, UrielReilly, Cavan SVock, David MGottlieb, Robert LMack, MichaelGolden, KevinDishner, EmmaVekstein, AndrewKo, Emily RDer, TatyanaFranzone, JohnAlmasri, EyadFayed, MohamedFilbin, Michael RHibbert, Kathryn ARice, Todd WCasey, Jonathan DHayanga, J AworiBadhwar, VinayLeshnower, Bradley GSharifpour, MiladKnowlton, Kirk UPeltan, Ithan DBakowska, ElizietaKowalska, JustynaBowdish, Michael ESturek, Jeffrey MRogers, Angela JFiles, D ClarkMosier, Jarrod MGong, Michelle NDouin, David JHite, R DuncanTrautner, Barbara WJain, Mamta KGardner, Edward MKhan, AkramJensen, Jens-UlrikMatthay, Michael AGinde, Adit ABrown, Samuel MHiggs, Elizabeth SPett, SarahWeintrob, Amy CChang, Christina CMurrary, Daniel DGünthard, Huldrych FMoquete, EllenGrandits, GregEngen, NicoleGrund, BirgitSharma, ShwetaCao, HuyenGupta, RajeshOsei, SuzetteMargolis, DavidZhu, QingPolizzotto, Mark NBabiker, Abdel GDavey, Victoria JKan, VirginiaThompson, B TaylorGelijns, Annetine CNeaton, James DLane, H CliffordJundgren, Jens DTierney, JohnBarrett, KevinHerpin, Betsey RSmolskis, Mary CVoge, Susan EMcNay, Laura ACahill, KellyCrew, PageKirchoff, MatthewSardana, RatnaRaim, Sharon SegalChiu, JosephHensley, LisaLorenzo, JosuaMock, RebeccaShaw-Saliba, KatyZuckerman, JudithAdam, Stacey JCurrier, JudyRead, SarahHughes, EricAmos, LauraCarlsen, AmyCarter, AnitaDavis, BioncaDenning, EileenDuChene, AlainHarrison, MerrieKaiser, PaytonKoopmeiners, JosephMeger, SueMurray, Thomas
Source
The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 22(5)
Subject
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Lung
Clinical Research
6.1 Pharmaceuticals
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
Good Health and Well Being
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Antibodies
Monoclonal
Antibodies
Monoclonal
Humanized
Antibodies
Neutralizing
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
SARS-CoV-2
Treatment Outcome
COVID-19 Drug Treatment
ACTIV-3/Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19 (TICO) Study Group
Clinical Sciences
Medical Microbiology
Public Health and Health Services
Microbiology
Language
Abstract
BackgroundWe aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of two neutralising monoclonal antibody therapies (sotrovimab [Vir Biotechnology and GlaxoSmithKline] and BRII-196 plus BRII-198 [Brii Biosciences]) for adults admitted to hospital for COVID-19 (hereafter referred to as hospitalised) with COVID-19.MethodsIn this multinational, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial (Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19 [TICO]), adults (aged ≥18 years) hospitalised with COVID-19 at 43 hospitals in the USA, Denmark, Switzerland, and Poland were recruited. Patients were eligible if they had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 symptoms for up to 12 days. Using a web-based application, participants were randomly assigned (2:1:2:1), stratified by trial site pharmacy, to sotrovimab 500 mg, matching placebo for sotrovimab, BRII-196 1000 mg plus BRII-198 1000 mg, or matching placebo for BRII-196 plus BRII-198, in addition to standard of care. Each study product was administered as a single dose given intravenously over 60 min. The concurrent placebo groups were pooled for analyses. The primary outcome was time to sustained clinical recovery, defined as discharge from the hospital to home and remaining at home for 14 consecutive days, up to day 90 after randomisation. Interim futility analyses were based on two seven-category ordinal outcome scales on day 5 that measured pulmonary status and extrapulmonary complications of COVID-19. The safety outcome was a composite of death, serious adverse events, incident organ failure, and serious coinfection up to day 90 after randomisation. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all patients randomly assigned to treatment who started the study infusion. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04501978.FindingsBetween Dec 16, 2020, and March 1, 2021, 546 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to sotrovimab (n=184), BRII-196 plus BRII-198 (n=183), or placebo (n=179), of whom 536 received part or all of their assigned study drug (sotrovimab n=182, BRII-196 plus BRII-198 n=176, or placebo n=178; median age of 60 years [IQR 50-72], 228 [43%] patients were female and 308 [57%] were male). At this point, enrolment was halted on the basis of the interim futility analysis. At day 5, neither the sotrovimab group nor the BRII-196 plus BRII-198 group had significantly higher odds of more favourable outcomes than the placebo group on either the pulmonary scale (adjusted odds ratio sotrovimab 1·07 [95% CI 0·74-1·56]; BRII-196 plus BRII-198 0·98 [95% CI 0·67-1·43]) or the pulmonary-plus complications scale (sotrovimab 1·08 [0·74-1·58]; BRII-196 plus BRII-198 1·00 [0·68-1·46]). By day 90, sustained clinical recovery was seen in 151 (85%) patients in the placebo group compared with 160 (88%) in the sotrovimab group (adjusted rate ratio 1·12 [95% CI 0·91-1·37]) and 155 (88%) in the BRII-196 plus BRII-198 group (1·08 [0·88-1·32]). The composite safety outcome up to day 90 was met by 48 (27%) patients in the placebo group, 42 (23%) in the sotrovimab group, and 45 (26%) in the BRII-196 plus BRII-198 group. 13 (7%) patients in the placebo group, 14 (8%) in the sotrovimab group, and 15 (9%) in the BRII-196 plus BRII-198 group died up to day 90.InterpretationNeither sotrovimab nor BRII-196 plus BRII-198 showed efficacy for improving clinical outcomes among adults hospitalised with COVID-19.FundingUS National Institutes of Health and Operation Warp Speed.