학술논문

Characterization of multiple diagnostic terms in melanocytic skin lesion pathology reports.
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of Cutaneous Pathology. 49(2)
Subject
MELTUMP
borderline diagnosis
dermatopathologists
dermatopathology
diagnostic dilemma
melanoma
Adult
Aged
Biopsy
Female
Humans
Male
Melanocytes
Middle Aged
Pathologists
Skin
Skin Neoplasms
Terminology as Topic
Language
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Histopathologically ambiguous melanocytic lesions lead some pathologists to list multiple diagnostic considerations in the pathology report. The frequency and circumstance of multiple diagnostic considerations remain poorly characterized. METHODS: Two hundred and forty skin biopsy samples were interpreted by 187 pathologists (8976 independent diagnoses) and classified according to a diagnostic/treatment stratification (MPATH-Dx). RESULTS: Multiple diagnoses in different MPATH-Dx classes were used in n = 1320 (14.7%) interpretations, with 97% of pathologists and 91% of cases having at least one such interpretation. Multiple diagnoses were more common for intermediate risk lesions and are associated with greater subjective difficulty and lower confidence. We estimate that 6% of pathology reports for melanocytic lesions in the United States contain two diagnoses of different MPATH-Dx prognostic classes, and 2% of cases are given two diagnoses with significant treatment implications. CONCLUSIONS: Difficult melanocytic diagnoses in skin may necessitate multiple diagnostic considerations; however, as patients increasingly access their health records and retrieve pathology reports (as mandated by US law), uncertainty should be expressed unambiguously.