학술논문

Practice, Practice, Practice! Effect of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta Volume on Outcomes: Data From the AAST AORTA Registry
Document Type
article
Source
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Cardiovascular Medicine and Haematology
Clinical Sciences
Clinical Research
Physical Injury - Accidents and Adverse Effects
Cardiovascular
Good Health and Well Being
Adult
Aorta
Balloon Occlusion
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Education
Medical
Continuing
Endovascular Procedures
Female
Hemorrhage
Hospitals
High-Volume
Hospitals
Low-Volume
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Surgeons
Thoracic Injuries
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Access Devices
Young Adult
REBOA
Trauma
Volume
Mortality
AAST AORTA Study Group
Surgery
Clinical sciences
Language
Abstract
BackgroundResuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an endovascular adjunct to hemorrhage control. Success relies on institutional support and focused training in arterial access. We hypothesized that hospitals with higher REBOA volumes will be more successful than low-volume hospitals at aortic occlusion with REBOA.MethodsThis is a retrospective study from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Registry from November 2013 to January 2018. Patients aged ≥18 y who underwent REBOA were included. Successful placement of REBOA catheters (defined as hemodynamic improvement with balloon inflation) was compared between high-volume (≥80 cases; two hospitals), mid-volume (10-20 cases; four hospitals), and low-volume (