학술논문

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Intrauterine Contraception and Tubal Ligation.
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of general internal medicine. 37(16)
Subject
Humans
Pelvic Pain
Copper
Levonorgestrel
Contraception
Sterilization
Tubal
Retrospective Studies
Pregnancy
United States
Female
Medicaid
comparative effectiveness
disparities
female sterilization
intrauterine contraception
low income
permanent contraception
reproductive justice
tubal ligation
Chronic Pain
Contraception/Reproduction
Pain Research
Clinical Research
Patient Safety
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
6.3 Medical devices
Clinical Sciences
General & Internal Medicine
Language
Abstract
BackgroundTubal ligation remains common in the USA, especially among low-income patients.ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness and safety of intrauterine contraceptives (IUC) to laparoscopic tubal ligation for Medicaid clients.DesignWe partnered with patient and clinician stakeholders to conduct a retrospective cohort study using California Medicaid claims for patients who had an IUC placed or laparoscopic tubal ligation performed in 2008-2014, excluding procedures performed within 42 days of a birth. We applied log-linear (Poisson) event-history regression models for clustered person-period data to adjust for sociodemographic variables and pre-procedure health status when examining associations between these contraceptive procedures and claims related to contraceptive failure, complications, and pain in the first year post-procedure.Key resultsWe identified 35,705 patients who had a levonorgestrel IUC placed, 23,628 patients who had a copper IUC placed, and 23,965 patients who underwent laparoscopic tubal ligation. In unadjusted analyses, rates of pregnancy within 1 year were similar following levonorgestrel IUC (2.40%) or copper IUC placement (2.99%) or tubal ligation (2.64%). In adjusted analyses, compared to tubal ligation, pregnancy was less common following placement of a levonorgestrel IUC (adj IRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.82) and similar with placement of a copper IUC (adj IRR 0.92, 95% CI 0.82-1.05). Procedural complications such as infection (0.35% vs. 2.91%) were significantly less common with IUC placement than tubal ligation. Claims for pelvic and abdominal pain decreased in frequency with time since all procedures; 6 to 12 months post-procedure, pelvic pain claims were less common after levonorgestrel IUC (adj IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.65-0.73) or copper IUC placement (adj IRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.66-0.75) than tubal ligation.ConclusionsIUC appears at least as effective as laparoscopic tubal ligation at 1-year post-procedure with lower rates of infection and pelvic pain 6 to 12 months post-procedure.Clinical trial registrationNCT03438682.