학술논문

How did the introduction of managed care for the uninsured in Iowa affect the use of substance abuse services?
Document Type
article
Source
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 30(1)
Subject
Clinical and Health Psychology
Health Services and Systems
Health Sciences
Psychology
Health Services
Drug Abuse (NIDA only)
Substance Misuse
Pediatric Research Initiative
Homelessness
Clinical Research
Management of diseases and conditions
Health and social care services research
7.1 Individual care needs
8.1 Organisation and delivery of services
Disputed aetiology and other
Mental health
Good Health and Well Being
Database Management Systems
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Female
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Iowa
Male
Managed Care Programs
Medically Uninsured
Mental Health Services
State Health Plans
Substance-Related Disorders
United States
Substance Abuse
Profit Maximization
Inpatient Setting
Cost Containment
Substance Abuse Problem
Public Health and Health Services
Social Work
Psychiatry
Health services and systems
Clinical and health psychology
Language
Abstract
Concerns about access under managed care have been raised for vulnerable populations such as publicly funded patients with substance abuse problems. To estimate the effects of the Iowa Managed Substance Abuse Care Plan (IMSACP) on substance abuse service use by publicly funded patients, service use before and after IMSACP was compared; adjustments were made for changes in population sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Between fiscal years 1994 and 1997, patient case mix was marked by a higher burden of illness and the use of inpatient, residential nondetox, outpatient counseling, and assessment services declined, while use of intensive outpatient and residential detox services increased. Findings were similar among women, children, and homeless persons. Thus, care moved away from high-cost inpatient settings to less costly venues. Without knowing the impact on treatment outcomes, these changes cannot be interpreted as improved provider efficiency versus simply cost containment and profit maximization.