학술논문
Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin Measured on Clinical Laboratory Platforms for the Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury and the Associated Need for Dialysis Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Document Type
article
Author
Albert, Christian; Zapf, Antonia; Haase, Michael; Röver, Christian; Pickering, John W; Albert, Annemarie; Bellomo, Rinaldo; Breidthardt, Tobias; Camou, Fabrice; Chen, Zhongquing; Chocron, Sidney; Cruz, Dinna; de Geus, Hilde RH; Devarajan, Prasad; Di Somma, Salvatore; Doi, Kent; Endre, Zoltan H; Garcia-Alvarez, Mercedes; Hjortrup, Peter B; Hur, Mina; Karaolanis, Georgios; Kavalci, Cemil; Kim, Hanah; Lentini, Paolo; Liebetrau, Christoph; Lipcsey, Miklós; Mårtensson, Johan; Müller, Christian; Nanas, Serafim; Nickolas, Thomas L; Pipili, Chrysoula; Ronco, Claudio; Rosa-Diez, Guillermo J; Ralib, Azrina; Soto, Karina; Braun-Dullaeus, Rüdiger C; Heinz, Judith; Haase-Fielitz, Anja
Source
American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 76(6)
Subject
Language
Abstract
Rationale & objectiveThe usefulness of measures of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in urine or plasma obtained on clinical laboratory platforms for predicting acute kidney injury (AKI) and AKI requiring dialysis (AKI-D) has not been fully evaluated. We sought to quantitatively summarize published data to evaluate the value of urinary and plasma NGAL for kidney risk prediction.Study designLiterature-based meta-analysis and individual-study-data meta-analysis of diagnostic studies following PRISMA-IPD guidelines.Setting & study populationsStudies of adults investigating AKI, severe AKI, and AKI-D in the setting of cardiac surgery, intensive care, or emergency department care using either urinary or plasma NGAL measured on clinical laboratory platforms.Selection criteria for studiesPubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and congress abstracts ever published through February 2020 reporting diagnostic test studies of NGAL measured on clinical laboratory platforms to predict AKI.Data extractionIndividual-study-data meta-analysis was accomplished by giving authors data specifications tailored to their studies and requesting standardized patient-level data analysis.Analytical approachIndividual-study-data meta-analysis used a bivariate time-to-event model for interval-censored data from which discriminative ability (AUC) was characterized. NGAL cutoff concentrations at 95% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and optimal sensitivity and specificity were also estimated. Models incorporated as confounders the clinical setting and use versus nonuse of urine output as a criterion for AKI. A literature-based meta-analysis was also performed for all published studies including those for which the authors were unable to provide individual-study data analyses.ResultsWe included 52 observational studies involving 13,040 patients. We analyzed 30 data sets for the individual-study-data meta-analysis. For AKI, severe AKI, and AKI-D, numbers of events were 837, 304, and 103 for analyses of urinary NGAL, respectively; these values were 705, 271, and 178 for analyses of plasma NGAL. Discriminative performance was similar in both meta-analyses. Individual-study-data meta-analysis AUCs for urinary NGAL were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73-0.76) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.79-0.81) for severe AKI and AKI-D, respectively; for plasma NGAL, the corresponding AUCs were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.79-0.81) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.84-0.86). Cutoff concentrations at 95% specificity for urinary NGAL were>580ng/mL with 27% sensitivity for severe AKI and>589ng/mL with 24% sensitivity for AKI-D. Corresponding cutoffs for plasma NGAL were>364ng/mL with 44% sensitivity and>546ng/mL with 26% sensitivity, respectively.LimitationsPractice variability in initiation of dialysis. Imperfect harmonization of data across studies.ConclusionsUrinary and plasma NGAL concentrations may identify patients at high risk for AKI in clinical research and practice. The cutoff concentrations reported in this study require prospective evaluation.