학술논문

Comparative Evaluation of Prophylactic SIV Vaccination Modalities Administered to the Oral Cavity
Document Type
article
Source
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses. 36(12)
Subject
Rare Diseases
Immunization
Vaccine Related
Infectious Diseases
Prevention
HIV/AIDS
Biotechnology
Vaccine Related (AIDS)
Dental/Oral and Craniofacial Disease
Prevention of disease and conditions
and promotion of well-being
3.4 Vaccines
Infection
Good Health and Well Being
Animals
Antibodies
Viral
Escherichia coli
Female
HIV Infections
Humans
Leukocytes
Mononuclear
Macaca mulatta
Mouth
SAIDS Vaccines
Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Simian Immunodeficiency Virus
Vaccination
Vaccinia virus
AIDS
SIV vaccine
DNA vaccine
mucosal immunity
Simian immunodeficiency virus
Clinical Sciences
Virology
Language
Abstract
Attempts to develop a protective human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine have had limited success, especially in terms of inducing protective antibodies capable of neutralizing different viral strains. As HIV transmission occurs mainly via mucosal surfaces, HIV replicates significantly in the gastrointestinal tract, and the oral route of vaccination is a very convenient one to implement worldwide, we explored three SIV vaccine modalities administered orally and composed of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) DNA priming with different boosting immunogens, with the goal of evaluating whether they could provide lasting humoral and cellular responses, including at mucosal surfaces that are sites of HIV entry. Twenty-four Cynomolgus macaques (CyM) were primed with replication-incompetent SIV DNA provirus and divided into three groups for the following booster vaccinations, all administered in the oral cavity: Group 1 with recombinant SIV gp140 and Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin adjuvant dmLT, Group 2 with recombinant SIV-Oral Poliovirus (SIV-OPV), and Group 3 with recombinant SIV-modified vaccinia ankara (SIV-MVA). Cell-mediated responses were measured using blood, lymph node, rectal and vaginal mononuclear cells. Significant levels of systemic and mucosal T-cell responses against Gag and Env were observed in all groups. Some SIV-specific plasma IgG, rectal and salivary IgA antibodies were generated, mainly in animals that received SIV DNA + SIV-MVA, but no vaginal IgA was detected. Susceptibility to infection after SIVmac251 challenge was similar in vaccinated and nonvaccinated animals, but acute infection viremia levels were lower in the group that received SIV DNA + SIV-MVA. Nonvaccinated CyM maintained central memory and total CD4+ T-cell levels in the normal range during the 5 months of postinfection follow-up as did the vaccinated animals, precluding evaluation of vaccine impact on disease progression. We conclude that the oral cavity vaccination tested in these regimens can stimulate cell-mediated immunity systemically and mucosally, but humoral response stimulation was limited with the doses and the vaccine platforms used.