학술논문

Development and Testing of an Emergency Department Quality Measure for Pediatric Suicidal Ideation and Self-Harm
Document Type
article
Source
Academic Pediatrics. 22(3)
Subject
Paediatrics
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Prevention
Health Services
Brain Disorders
Emergency Care
Serious Mental Illness
Mental Health
Behavioral and Social Science
Suicide
Pediatric
Clinical Research
Mental health
Good Health and Well Being
Adolescent
Child
Child
Preschool
Emergency Service
Hospital
Humans
Male
Quality Indicators
Health Care
Reproducibility of Results
Self-Injurious Behavior
Suicidal Ideation
United States
emergency department
follow-up care
quality measure
self-harm
suicidal ideation
Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
Pediatrics
Language
Abstract
ObjectiveTo develop and test a new quality measure assessing timeliness of follow-up mental health care for youth presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suicidal ideation or self-harm.MethodsBased on a conceptual framework, evidence review, and a modified Delphi process, we developed a quality measure assessing whether youth 5 to 17 years old evaluated for suicidal ideation or self-harm in the ED and discharged to home had a follow-up mental health care visit within 7 days. The measure was tested in 4 geographically dispersed states (California, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee) using Medicaid administrative data. We examined measure feasibility of implementation, variation, reliability, and validity. To test validity, adjusted regression models examined associations between quality measure scores and subsequent all-cause and same-cause hospital readmissions/ED return visits.ResultsOverall, there were 16,486 eligible ED visits between September 1, 2014 and July 31, 2016; 53.5% of eligible ED visits had an associated mental health care follow-up visit within 7 days. Measure scores varied by state, ranging from 26.3% to 66.5%, and by youth characteristics: visits by youth who were non-White, male, and living in an urban area were significantly less likely to be associated with a follow-up visit within 7 days. Better quality measure performance was not associated with decreased reutilization.ConclusionsThis new ED quality measure may be useful for monitoring and improving the quality of care for this vulnerable population; however, future work is needed to establish the measure's predictive validity using more prevalent outcomes such as recurrence of suicidal ideation or deliberate self-harm.