학술논문

The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based conclusions about the disorder
Document Type
article
Author
Faraone, Stephen VBanaschewski, TobiasCoghill, DavidZheng, YiBiederman, JosephBellgrove, Mark ANewcorn, Jeffrey HGignac, MartinSaud, Nouf M AlManor, IrisRohde, Luis AugustoYang, LiCortese, SamueleAlmagor, DoronStein, Mark AAlbatti, Turki HAljoudi, Haya FAlqahtani, Mohammed MJAsherson, PhilipAtwoli, LukoyeBölte, SvenBuitelaar, Jan KCrunelle, Cleo LDaley, DavidDalsgaard, SørenDöpfner, ManfredEspinet, StaceyFitzgerald, MichaelFranke, BarbaraGerlach, ManfredHaavik, JanHartman, Catharina AHartung, Cynthia MHinshaw, Stephen PHoekstra, Pieter JHollis, ChrisKollins, Scott HKooij, JJ SandraKuntsi, JonnaLarsson, HenrikLi, TingyuLiu, JingMerzon, EugeneMattingly, GregoryMattos, PauloMcCarthy, SuzanneMikami, Amori YeeMolina, Brooke SGNigg, Joel TPurper-Ouakil, DianeOmigbodun, Olayinka OPolanczyk, Guilherme VPollak, YehudaPoulton, Alison SRajkumar, Ravi PhilipReding, AndrewReif, AndreasRubia, KatyaRucklidge, JuliaRomanos, MarcelRamos-Quiroga, J AntoniSchellekens, ArntScheres, AnoukSchoeman, RenataSchweitzer, Julie BShah, HenalSolanto, Mary VSonuga-Barke, EdmundSoutullo, CésarSteinhausen, Hans-ChristophSwanson, James MThapar, AnitaTripp, Gailvan de Glind, Geurtvan den Brink, WimVan der Oord, SaskiaVenter, AndreVitiello, BenedettoWalitza, SusanneWang, Yufeng
Source
Subject
Epidemiology
Health Sciences
Mental Health
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Humans
Network Meta-Analysis
Publication Bias
ADHD
Diagnosis
Treatment
Course
Outcome
Genetics
Brain
Medical and Health Sciences
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
Behavioral Science & Comparative Psychology
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Health sciences
Language
Abstract
BackgroundMisconceptions about ADHD stigmatize affected people, reduce credibility of providers, and prevent/delay treatment. To challenge misconceptions, we curated findings with strong evidence base.MethodsWe reviewed studies with more than 2000 participants or meta-analyses from five or more studies or 2000 or more participants. We excluded meta-analyses that did not assess publication bias, except for meta-analyses of prevalence. For network meta-analyses we required comparison adjusted funnel plots. We excluded treatment studies with waiting-list or treatment as usual controls. From this literature, we extracted evidence-based assertions about the disorder.ResultsWe generated 208 empirically supported statements about ADHD. The status of the included statements as empirically supported is approved by 80 authors from 27 countries and 6 continents. The contents of the manuscript are endorsed by 366 people who have read this document and agree with its contents.ConclusionsMany findings in ADHD are supported by meta-analysis. These allow for firm statements about the nature, course, outcome causes, and treatments for disorders that are useful for reducing misconceptions and stigma.