학술논문

Cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for essential tremor: A double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover, add-on clinical trial
Document Type
article
Source
Brain Stimulation. 13(1)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Health Sciences
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Neurosciences
Rehabilitation
Clinical Research
Brain Disorders
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
6.3 Medical devices
Neurological
Adult
Cerebellum
Double-Blind Method
Essential Tremor
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Essential tremor
Non-invasive brain stimulation
Clinical trial
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
rTMS
Medical and Health Sciences
Neurology & Neurosurgery
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Health sciences
Language
Abstract
BACKGROUND:There is controversial evidence about the effect of cerebellar low-frequency stimulation in patients with essential tremor (ET). OBJECTIVES:In this study we assessed safety and effectiveness of 1 Hz (low-frequency) cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on tremor severity in patients with essential tremor in a sham-controlled crossover trial. METHODS:A total of 23 patients assigned into two groups to receive either sham (n = 10) or rTMS (n = 13) treatment, with crossing over after a two-month washout period. Intervention consisted of 900 pulses of 1 Hz rTMS at 90% resting motor threshold or the same protocol of sham stimulation over each cerebellar hemisphere for 5 consecutive days. Tremor severity was assessed by Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) scale at baseline and at days 5, 12 and 30 after intervention. The FTM consists of 3 subscales including tremor severity rating, performance of motor tasks, and functional disability. Carry-over and treatment effects were analyzed using independent samples t-test. RESULTS:There was no significant improvement in the total FTM scores in rTMS compared to the sham stimulation on day 5 (p = 0.132), day 12 (p = 0.574), or day 30 (p = 0.382). Similarly, FTM subscales, including tremor severity rating, motor tasks, and functional disability did not improve significantly after rTMS treatment. Mild headache and local pain were the most frequent adverse events. CONCLUSION:Although cerebellar rTMS seems to have acceptable safety when used in ET patients, this study could not prove any efficacy for it in reduction of tremor in these patients. Larger studies are needed to evaluate efficacy of this therapeutic intervention and to provide evidence about the optimal stimulation parameters.