학술논문

Abdominal fat radiodensity, quantity and cardiometabolic risk: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Document Type
article
Source
Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases. 26(2)
Subject
Medical Biochemistry and Metabolomics
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Cardiovascular Medicine and Haematology
Nutrition and Dietetics
Diabetes
Cardiovascular
Aging
Nutrition
Obesity
Atherosclerosis
Biomedical Imaging
Prevention
Aetiology
2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Abdominal Fat
Adiponectin
Adiposity
Aged
Biomarkers
C-Reactive Protein
Female
Humans
Incidence
Insulin
Intra-Abdominal Fat
Leptin
Linear Models
Logistic Models
Male
Metabolic Syndrome
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Predictive Value of Tests
Prevalence
Proportional Hazards Models
Risk Factors
Subcutaneous Fat
Abdominal
Tomography
X-Ray Computed
United States
Metabolic syndrome
C-reactive protein
Medical and Health Sciences
Cardiovascular System & Hematology
Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
Medical biochemistry and metabolomics
Nutrition and dietetics
Language
Abstract
Background and aimsFat radiodensity, as measured by fat attenuation on computed tomography (CT), has emerged as a potential biomarker of "fat quality." We sought to characterize the relationship between fat radiodensity and quantity in subcutaneous, visceral, and intermuscular fat depots, and its role in inflammation, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome (MetS).Methods and resultsWe studied 1511 individuals from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis who underwent CT for measurement of regional fat distribution and radiodensity, along with biomarker assessments and adjudication of incident metabolic syndrome (MetS). Linear, logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to measure association between fat radiodensity and (1) fat quantity, (2) biomarkers of cardiometabolic dysfunction, and (3) both prevalent and incident MetS. In each fat depot, radiodensity was strongly and inversely associated with quantity (e.g., visceral fat radiodensity vs. quantity: ρ = -0.82, P < 0.01). After adjustment for age, sex and race, lower visceral fat radiodensity was associated with greater C-reactive protein, leptin and insulin, but lower adiponectin (P < 0.01 for all). After full adjustment for cardiovascular disease risk factors, visceral (but not subcutaneous or intermuscular) fat radiodensity was associated with prevalent MetS (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93-0.99, P = 0.01). Moreover, lower visceral fat radiodensity was associated with incident MetS after the same adjustment (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.98, P < 0.01). However, this association became non-significant after further adjustment for visceral fat quantity.ConclusionFat radiodensity is strongly correlated with fat quantity and relevant inflammatory biomarkers. Fat radiodensity (especially for visceral fat) may be a complementary, easily assessed marker of cardiometabolic risk.