부산대학교 도서관

Although the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union has broadened its objectives to integrate social issues, several hard‐to‐reach groups of farmers and workers continue to be ignored by advisory services and associated policies. Connecting with these groups has a strong potential to increase the economic and social cohesion of European agricultures. We interviewed over 1,000 farmers across Europe and identified features of these groups that are often overlooked by advisory services. We critically reflected on the social cohorts omitted from advisory services and how they could be better reached; they include farm labourers, new entrants or ‘career changers’, and later adopters. We clarify the different types of advisors in the advisory landscape, distinguishing between those who are linked to or independent from sales of inputs or technologies. We make concrete recommendations about how to engage advisors with hard‐to‐reach groups, with approaches suited to different national contexts of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS); thus contributing to the ‘AKIS dimension of National Strategic Plans of the next Common Agricultural Policy, 2023–2027. We argue for the more effective use of advances in the social sciences through a better understanding of advice as social interaction which can bolster the inclusiveness of public policies. Bien que la Politique agricole commune de l’Union européenne ait élargi ses objectifs pour intégrer les questions sociales, plusieurs groupes d’agriculteurs et de travailleurs continuent d’être ignorés par les services de conseil et les politiques associées. Établir un lien avec ces groupes difficiles d’accès pourrait permettre d’accroître la cohésion économique et sociale des agricultures européennes. Nous avons interrogé plus de 1,000 agriculteurs à travers l’Europe et identifié les caractéristiques de groupes qui sont souvent ignorés par les services de conseil. Nous avons examiné de manière critique les cohorte