학술논문
L’Antiquité tardive : périodisations d’un âge noir et heureux
Document Type
article
Author
Source
Collection « ISTA » 1332(1):29-41
Subject
Language
French
Abstract
Cet essai est dédié à l’évolution de l’idée de « Bas-Empire/ Antiquité tardive » de Ch. Le Beau jusqu’à nos jours ; une attention particulière est réservée à la pensée de J. B. Bury, à la définition d’empire chrétien chez A. Piganiol et d’ère constantinienne chez S. Mazzarino, ainsi qu’à la réaction de A. Giardina et la récente historiographie anglaise sur P. Brown et son interprétation socio-culturelle de l’Antiquité tardive. La perspective religieuse se révèle décisive pour délimiter l’Antiquité tardive entre Constantin et Mahomet.
" Late Antiquity: Periodizations of a Dark and Happy Age ". This paper is concerned with the development of the idea of “Later Empire/ late antiquity” since Ch. Le Beau until us ; special care is devoted to J. B. Bury’s thought, to A. Piganiol’s definition of Christian empire, to S. Mazzarino’s definition of Constantinian age, to the arguments of A. Giardina et recent British scholarship against P. Brown’s social and cultural interpretation of late antiquity. Religious perspective proves to be deciding in containing late antiquity between Constantine and Muhammad.
" Late Antiquity: Periodizations of a Dark and Happy Age ". This paper is concerned with the development of the idea of “Later Empire/ late antiquity” since Ch. Le Beau until us ; special care is devoted to J. B. Bury’s thought, to A. Piganiol’s definition of Christian empire, to S. Mazzarino’s definition of Constantinian age, to the arguments of A. Giardina et recent British scholarship against P. Brown’s social and cultural interpretation of late antiquity. Religious perspective proves to be deciding in containing late antiquity between Constantine and Muhammad.