학술논문

Posterior Interosseous Flap and Its Variations for Coverage of Hand Wounds
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. Sep 01, 1998 45(3):570-574
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
0022-5282
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conventional posterior interosseous flap has the disadvantage of partial or even complete necrosis of the flap when there is anatomical variation or contusion around its distal pedicle. To make it a more reliable flap, three types of auxiliary procedures were designed. METHODS: (1) When there is congestion after inset of the distally hased flap, an additional venous anastomosis was carried out. (2) When there is anatomical variation so that a distally based flap could not be raised without compromising the nerve branches, or when contusion was found around the distal pedicle, the flap was changed into a free flap. This design is also indicated for coverage of the distal fingers. (3) When the patient is elderly with possible peripheral arterial disease, the flap was raised with a wide base, incorporating the branches of both the anterior and posterior interosseous arteries. There were eight, 36, and five patients in each group, respectively. RESULTS: There was only one failure in the free flap group. No partial necrosis of the flap was found. Other complications were analyzed. CONCLUSION: With these backup procedures, the posterior interosseous flap can be more widely used with safety. By combining various reconstructive armaments, the result of a conventional procedure can be improved.