학술논문

Anger and acne: implications for quality of life, patient satisfaction and clinical care
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
British Journal of Dermatology. Jul 01, 2004 151(1):183-189
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
0007-0963
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acne is a common skin disorder with a significant psychological and social impact for some people. Little is known about how personality and emotional traits affect acne and its impact on quality of life and treatment. Trait anger (TA), which is related to heart disease and other morbidities, may also affect acne and patientsʼ adjustment to it. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between TA and acne severity, skin-related quality of life, satisfaction with treatment, and adherence to treatment. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A sample of 479 individuals with acne completed a survey instrument to assess acne severity, skin care practices, skin-related quality of life, satisfaction with treatment, adherence, TA and demographic variables. Respondents who reported high TA were compared with individuals with low TA on outcome variables. Regression analyses adjusted for covariates and identified the significant predictors of quality of life, satisfaction and adherence. RESULTS: High TA was unrelated to acne severity (P = 0·2) or frequency of face washing (P = 0·9). Anger was significantly related to both global quality of life (P < 0·001) and skin-related quality of life (P = 0·002) as well as to satisfaction with treatment (P = 0·001) and adherence to treatment advice (P = 0·05) in bivariate analyses. Regression analyses revealed that high TA remained a significant predictor of global (P < 0·001) and skin-related quality of life (P = 0·003) and satisfaction with treatment (P = 0·04), but not adherence to treatment advice (P = 0·8) after controlling for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Anger is associated with the quality of patientsʼ lives and with their satisfaction with treatment. Care of acne patients should include attention to anger and other chronic emotional states, quality of life, as well as to clinical severity. Simple guidelines are suggested for how clinicians might approach this important aspect of care.