학술논문

Retinopathy of prematurity in English neonatal units: a national population-based analysis using NHS operational data
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Wong, Hilary SSanthakumaran, ShaliniStatnikov, YevgeniyGray, DanielWatkinson, MichaelModi, NeenaKadalraja, RKefas, JSrinnel, SRamesh, CRackham, OBrearey, SThirumurugan, ALosa, IMcBride, TZipitis, CAmegavie, LMoise, JZipitis, CYadan, MMaddock, NMoise, JEdi-Osagie, NHeal, CBirch, JAl-Zidgali, FHasib, AKisat, HSoe, ALong, DFedee, JLama, MGupta, RRawlingson de Boer, RCRao, PBlake, KBhaduri, AKHalahakoon, CDeshpande Mohite, ATewary, KKPalmer, KGallagher, ANycyk, JSimmons, PMorgen, IUnderhill, HCMahesh Babu, R NDalton, SDixon, HJames, MJayalal, VDyke, MBabiker, SSoe, TRubin, SOgilvy-Stuart, AEvans, IWickham, Tvan Someren, VWatkin, SBlumberg, RSharief, NAladangady, NSharma, BSullivan, CAlsford, LSharma, BKhan, AHamdan, SAhmed, JSFoo, ATalekar, RAdiotomre, PGibson, AThomas, MMathur, RCruwys, MMannix, PAriff, HGarbasa, MLal, MBosman, DFenton, ABolton, ARAbu-Harb, MVerber, IOlivier, JLarson, JCherinet, YMunyard, POsbourne, NRaman, MWatts, THannam, SWalter, SKuna, JChang, YLShephard, RLindo, DCalvert, SWigfield, RWylie, PMisra, IShettihalli, NKhashu, MHall, MGroves, Cde Halpert, PSchapira, DKinsey, SButterworth, SGarg, AWhitehead, GSanghavi, RWhincup, GKhader, KMallik, AAmess, PGodden, CReynolds, PBrannan, NNoble, VRao, ASWardle, SRatnayaka, MHolman, JZengeya, SJones, SWach, RTooley, JMann, RJEaton, MBabirecki, MSeal, SSchwartz, KGibson, DJampala, CPairaudeau, PMiall, LShyamannr, KQunib, M
Source
Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition. May 01, 2014 99(3):F196-F202
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
1359-2998
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To report on retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening compliance against a national guideline, factors associated with non-compliance and effect on ROP treatment. DESIGN: National cohort study using operational NHS data from the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD) for the period 2009–2011. SETTING: 161 (94%) neonatal units in England. POPULATION: Infants born below 32 weeks’ gestation and/or with a birth weight below 1501 g. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ROP screening status (‘on-time’, ‘early’, ‘late’, ‘unknown’) and associated infant and neonatal unit characteristics, ROP treatment. RESULTS: The proportion of infants screened on-time increased over the study period (p<0.001). Of 19 821 eligible infants, 7602 (38.4%) were recorded to have received ROP screening in accordance with the national guideline; 7474 (37.8%) received screening outside the recommended time period; data were missing for 4745 (16.7%) infants. For 16 411 infants in neonatal care during the recommended screening period, late screening was significantly associated with lower gestational age (relative risk ratio (RRR) (95% credible interval) for late versus on-time screening 0.83 (0.80 to 0.86) for each increased week of gestation) and care in a neonatal unit providing less than 500 days of intensive care per annum (2.48 (0.99 to 4.99)). Infants screened late were almost 40% more likely to receive ROP treatment (OR (95% CI) 1.36 (1.05 to 1.76)). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding organisational differences between neonatal units may help improve ROP screening. Patient-level electronic NHS clinical data offer opportunity for future rapid, low cost, population-based evaluations but require improved data entry.