학술논문

OC-099 The two-week clinic for bowel cancer isn’t working; a re-audit of referrals twelve years on
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
Gut. Jun 01, 2015 64(Suppl_1 Suppl 1):A49-A49
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
0017-5749
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Considerable resources have been used to achieve DOH targets for Two-week Colorectal Clinics (TWC) but few studies have monitored the increase in referrals, the decrease in diagnostic yield (DY) of referral criteria and whether this costly strategy has improved outcomes. METHOD: A prospective study of the numbers referred to the TWC in Portsmouth for each of the referral criteria and the DY for bowel cancer in 2013/14 compared with 2000/1. RESULTS: The last 12 years has seen a 235% increase (695to 1636) in referrals to the TWC, compared to a 130% increase (1815to 2404) in routine clinics. 41% of all new patient referrals to surgical clinics are to the TWC, compared to 27% in 2000/1. An extra 194 clinics per year are required to see these patients. DY for cancer in the TWC has fallen from 9.4% (65/695) to 4.1% (20/487). The greatest fall was for patients referred with a change in bowel habit with rectal bleeding.(Table is included in full-text article.) CONCLUSION: A doubling in outpatient staff has been required to cope with the increase in referrals to the TWC. There has been a decrease in adherence to the TWC referral criteria, particularly change in bowel habit, resulting in a DY of 1.8% (3/170) for patients referred with C+B-. Unless this is improved there is little point in continuing with the TWC. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared. REFERENCES