부산대학교 도서관

BACKGROUND:: Environmental auditing is an important tool to ensure consistent and effective cleaning. Our pilot study compared an alcohol-based fluorescent marking product and an adenosine-5′-triphosphate bioluminescence product for use in an environmental auditing program to determine which product was more practical and acceptable to users. METHODS:: Both products were tested on 15 preselected high touch objects in randomly selected patient rooms, following regular daily cleaning. A room was considered a “pass” if ≥80% of surfaces were adequately cleaned as defined by manufacturersʼ guidelines. A qualitative survey assessed user preference and operational considerations. RESULTS:: Using fluorescent marking, 9 of 37 patient rooms evaluated (24%) were considered a “pass” after daily cleaning. Using adenosine-5′-triphosphate bioluminescence, 21 of 37 patient rooms passed (57%). There was great variability in results between different high touch objects. Eighty percent of users preferred the alcohol-based fluorescent marking product because it provided an effective visual aid to coach staff on proper cleaning techniques and allowed simple and consistent application. CONCLUSIONS:: Environmental auditing using translucent, alcohol-based fluorescent marking best met the requirements of our organization. Our results reinforce the importance of involving a multidisciplinary team in evaluating and operationalizing an environmental auditing program.