부산대학교 도서관

Background: Guidelines are still unclear regarding whether mechanical or bioprosthetic valves should be selected for mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients aged 50-70 years.Aims: To assess long-term outcomes in patients aged 50-70 years undergoing MVR using contemporary mechanical and bioprosthetic valves.Methods: We performed a retrospective study using the TriNetX global database to identify patients aged 50 to 70 years who had primary isolated surgical MVR from 2014 to 2020. Patients who had concomitant or prior cardiac surgeries were excluded. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: mechanical and bioprosthetic, and a 1:1 propensity-score matching to control for baseline differences between the two groups was performed. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and secondary endpoints were stroke, major bleeding, and reoperation over a follow-up period of 8 years.Results: Propensity-score matching yielded 1,130 patients in each group. There were significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding events in the mechanical group compared to the bioprosthetic valve. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding reoperation (Table 1 and Figure 1).Conclusion: At an 8-year follow-up, the use of contemporary bioprosthetic valves for MVR in patients aged 50-70 years shows favorable all-cause mortality and lower rates of strokes and major bleeding with similar reoperation rates compared to mechanical valves.